You obviously do not understand the meaning of the word pathological. He struggles with his deception, and is constantly slipping back to his usual mannerisms, to the point of almost being discovered. His lie wasn't to get into Jasmine's pants, though, it was to be in a position of worth and status where he wouldn't…

No, you wouldn't. I can say that with almost 100% certainty that you'd recognise that the noise was either from a concert or from an attraction of some sort; like a roller coaster. If you disregard the high pitch screaming, you can clearly tell they are cheering; it's not just isolated screaming.

Co-op is optional, so you don't have to engage in it if you don't want to.

But you are encouraging cheating, even if you're not actively endorsing the act itself. You're giving hackers attention, positive attention, and propagating an attitude that it's "okay", or at least agreeable, to cheat as long as it's entertaining. It's not like the hack is harmless, it makes the character invincible…

As much as it's amusing, is it really appropriate to feature and encourage a hacker in this kind of show? It becomes especially questionable when you compare it to the other players that by all rights should feel cheated to have their achievements ranked alongside a cheater who just used a cheat program to break the…

Several games have been more emotional than Last of Us without needing to rely on such trauma bait. The ending of Bastion is one such example that elevates a game above its gameplay and surprises you with the depth of characters you had no reason to assume even had depth to begin with. The faceless enemies you'd been…

Several games have been more emotional than Last of Us without needing to rely on such trauma bait. The ending of Bastion is one such example that elevates a game above its gameplay and surprises you with the depth of characters you had no reason to assume even had depth to begin with. The faceless enemies you'd been…

"And I'd love to see your reaction when—or, rather, if—someone you like became a gross sweeping generalization for a cheap laugh."

It doesn't matter what you're doing, you don't need 43 terabits for video games. When it comes to video game latency, you can only ever have as little latency as it takes for the signal to travel from your computer to the server via the shortest possible route. The signal can never, ever be faster than that (unless we…

Net neutrality laws do not affect download speeds, they affect line priority - which is different. You can download data at 1Gbps and it won't matter if a bottleneck is choking the stream and slowing it down from the source.

As a former internet technician, I really appreciate the time taken to write that :P

Well, as much as that kind of data transfer is unlikely to ever be used by consumers - and entirely unnecessary for that matter - the speed of the internet is likely to explode in an exponential increase as technology improves. Take RLNC for instance, a new kind of algorithm that is looking to replace our TCP network…

... This is such a pet peeve, and nothing but a pet peeve. I can appreciate that you enjoy a different gaming experience than what they're selling, but that is not a good complaint regarding quality. It's also just plain wrong to say that the statement "if you can see it, you can go to it," is an attempt to attract…

It looks pretty damn flat to me, since the character doesn't move nor behave with any kind of regard for perspective. The feet also seem to float about the floor, sliding back and forth as the camera moves. The thing is, is that the image doesn't appear to entirely rotate to face the camera like these sprite typically…

I would offer you some retort, some explaination for why your entire argument isn't just vapid, it's probably the dumbest thing on this entire page. But I don't have to - because your argument falls apart with just a single request.

I hold firm that my "quite a few" statement is as valid as it was when I said it, because even the people who don't want to outright call him a rapist... call him a rapist. This article has fundamentally decried him as a "unwitting rapist", which seems to be a thing now.

Hysteria is an exaggerated emotional response, and that's where the definition ends no matter what you wish to read into it. Regardless of how many people participates, it's still a criteria that can be met, and has been on a multitude of occasions already. I'm not saying that everyone is talking about this or that…

I never claimed she was hysteric, I said I wouldn't "dignify this hysteria with an apology." Since the pressure to apologize comes from a mob of aggressors instead of a single woman, I stand by my choice of words. Just go read their twitter feed and see for yourself.

Innocent until proven guilty, and yes - this IS a term that only applies to the accused party so don't try to spin this around. As no evidence possibly can be established of a decade old heart break, I will presume him innocent until evidence can be presented to show otherwise. If the accusation is made without merit,…

Frankly, I'd hesitate to even dignify this hysteria with an apology, so good one or not, you really had no business expecting him to apologise in the first place, in the face a false accusation and defamation attempt. If they never had sex, via any means of penetration - penile or otherwise - then what she's referring…