adversar-old
Adversar
adversar-old

accurate numbers are important... but not as important as the work towards ensuring all humans have the ability to choose their own destiny, it's ok to point out issues with the numbers, but idk, this seems like a complete d-head move.

can you elaborate? (i am asking out of interest, not as an attack).

!@#$#!... and this is just one example of why dirty cops should be put to sleep.

Heh, accept the Ron Paul's decriminalization of drugs would put less people into prison to begin with.

This I say I am sure just for ego gratification. One of the choices I made in life is to live in cleveland hieghts, in an area called coventry. It's known not for tolerance but acceptance diversity. On the strip there are businesses run by; black men and women, white women, lesbians, and the like. The court yard looks

Did you see this:

I accept that almost all stats are muddled and inaccurate. Do dating sites represent a cross section of humanity as a whole, or just a cross section of humanity that uses dating sights? IDK. What I do know is that in areas where blacks live there tend to be a lot of churches. Being an atheist I have a bias against

racism is only racism when the intent is there to marginalize (inferiority) an show a dislike towards (hatred) a group based soley on their race. This image, in context, does neither.

Allowing homosexuals to marry, or other non-traditional marriages, alone does not create legal equality. It takes more than just that.

I'm ok with that. Totalitarianism for freedom :) I order you to be free and equal!

Unfair! :P

I used the dating stats to show that many blacks state they are religious. The popular religions in the states are mostly homophobic. Preaching tolerance for homosexuals can get religious leaders in a heap of hot water, so it is rare that we see this. Religion comes with much intolerance in experience with life, and

i agree that the usage of 'the blacks' monolithic and a gross generalization. i also agree with your stance that this tends to be an issue with religious people. i find generalizations 'fair' because i see them for what they are, broad statements that arent all inclusive in reality.

i wont begrudge you your personal feelings of hurt, but i would ask you to put this in context of modern times, and location of the ad; india. there arent many white people in india, so your servants arent going to be white. Those in india have have no cultural awareness of what is offensive in the US, and frankly I

as long as they are on your side then they are not the enemy is how i see it. She has not taken my side (the side that says equality must be granted to everyone) thus she is the enemy to this idea.

Not sure how you get that idea. Religious institutions also have no business, out side of their followers, defining what marriage or relationships either. I am for people defining their own relationships, marriages, partnerships, or whatever you want to call them. The government has no business supporting one

I consider Obama nothing more than a better spoken and darker skinned version of GW Bush. I often refer to him as Bush Lite. Our civil liberties are in the same mess bush left them.

No. Her job is that of every human being. When you do not speak and act out against atrocity you are complicate. She is in a position that allows her voice and ideas to be heard by the masses and has an obligation to humanity to promote that which leads to human ascension. Her silence on this is the same as the swiss

I have long held the view that either you are on my side or you are not, and those not on my side are the enemy. This view was formed early on in life, shortly after my personal discovery of the holocaust. The swiss claimed to be neutral, yet sold the Germans zyklon b. Neutrality means that you continue to deal with

and being a black maid somehow states she is inferior to others or hated?