This just shows that AI can replace the boilerplate duckspeak that campaign and administration staffers use under normal presidents. Clearly it doesn’t understand Trump and his tactics. Not once does it stoke fear, mock others or self-aggrandize. It’s like what a political consultant would write if you demanded they…

This assumes a low natural frequency of assholes that has yet to be proven.

That would be “Amos Moses” by Jerry Reed (who you may know as Snowman from the “Smoky And The Bandit” movies or Coach Red from “The Waterboy”), Kenny Rogers’ “The Gambler” and the last song is by a group called Alabama. Not a big fan of Rogers or Alabama but even though his biggest hits were comedy or gimmick songs…

Seems like anyone with a legitimate use for this can make one pretty easily, down to a nice case if they have a 3d printer. So ban it. The rest of the market is criminals and pranksters. At least make them learn something to keep up with their bullshit.

The guy on Reddit talking about how it’ll be “such a revolution in masturbatory technology that population decline may follow" was hilarious. 

Together the Swiftie family will devour the very gods! They should probably watch out for the sole weapon that can kill her which the devs left in the parking lot outside the boss room though. Kind of a gimmicky fight tbh.

True. A much better story would be finding others who have used AI on dating apps, even if not as extensively as this guy, and to have the author give commercially available products a try. That would at least give a variety of experiences and a snapshot of the current consumer technology.

It’s two people’s testimony about their personal relationship. It’s impossible to directly verify their emotions and mental states but investigating their daily lives would be invasive and illegal. So what do you want them to do? Go gossip with their friends and family?

In short, it’s the Roman Republic leading up to its collapse

How do other countries keep their politicians from purposely passing vague laws so that they can then weaponize them against each other and their respective partisans? Because that’s what we would immediately do with hate speech laws. Spend all our time figuring out how our opponents may be guilty of breaking them, no…

Why do you describe a question as a trap and frame a conversation as a confrontation? The original question is not hostile. You are though. Just having a bad...how ever long it’s been since things were good for you? 

The case you mentioned is about whether the police can stop you and demand to see a license and registration without cause. Freedom from arbitrary interrogation by government agents is not the same right to privacy as you're talking about. 

I believe the camming community has come up with a two step process to weed out fakes called "Shoe On Head".

I think people sense that the idea of cancel culture has been weaponized in our ongoing culture war. It’s always existed. What else but cancel culture killed Alan Turing and broke Oscar Wilde, blighting the lives of gay people, even upper class European ones, for centuries?

Had Mitch McConnell killed. Just like Joe should have Trump’s SCOTUS appointees whacked. If more politicians were willing to resort to violence and assassination we’d get a lot more done in this country.

He wrote and performed his show, she inspired a show. There’s a difference. And anyway Chappelle was wrong to try to use the bully pulpit of his celebrity to change a contract after the fact when he knew the terms when he signed it. And even with his fame he wouldn't have gotten his way without insinuating that the…

I imagine the author did as most people do; Googled, glanced at the first thing that bolstered his argument that looked reasonably authoritative and then copy pasted it. The usual combination of intellectual laziness and confirmation bias. It happens to us all but you'd think journalists would be a bit more careful.…

This is going to be a contest to see which “comedian” can suck all the humor and life out of a scene. Hamfest 2024. My money is on McCarthy, although that might be because her recent series of travel ads has made me dislike her even more than previously.

I believe the situation is that the majority of the people with the syndromes mentioned above do not identify as intersex. The difference seems to be that their conditions did not “require”, as they thought at the time, gross surgical alterations to live as one gender or another.

“Estimates of the frequency of intersex births range from 0.018% to as high as 1.7%" is information. ”Being intersex is as common as having red hair" is misinformation. Taking the highest data point out of a range and only presenting that, along with an easy to comprehend comparison, is like taking a quote out of…