If you believe that the purpose of imprisonment is rehabilitation, she’s clearly an exemplar of the value of the criminal justice system and her previous crimes should be left in the past. If you believe that the purpose of imprisonment is punishment, then she’s been appropriately punished. Therefore, bringing that up…

The time to leave is when he’s up, at the podium, lights in his eyes. He just hears rustling, and the volume of the people in front of him getting quieter, and then when he’s done, there’s Sean Hannity, sitting all alone, front and center.

He just won’t show. There’s no percentage in it for him to do so - everyone there will hate him, even if they don’t already (with the exception of Sean Hannity, who will be seated under the table directly in front of Trump, as is his custom). However, if he doesn’t go, then he plays to his base that he’s a man of the…

Or as corrupt as ours is right now!

There’s sort of 3 types of people who voted for Trump.

Anyone else think we all need to watch carefully to see if she starts to blink “Help me” in Morse one of these days?

I agree. I don’t see how anyone can say, “Oh, yeah, it’s a joke.” It’s not. It’s assault. If a gay man (or for that matter, a straight one) grabbed that guy by his junk, you know he wouldn’t see it as a joke. So why would he say it’s OK when he does it to someone else? It’s because he’s a moron. My dad got it and made…

Also, Seth Meyer, who did a better job of directly pointing out that Kellyanne Conway was pivoting to a non sequitor and NOT answering a question and literally any reporter did during the entire campaign.

I like that his logic is “Because the intelligence agencies didn’t censor the press before they released this, we live in Nazi Germany.” I think he’s got that exactly backward.

Yeah, but a lot of people who criticized Obama did so for racist reasons or using racist coded language and images(“thug,” drawings of him with exaggerated ears or simian features, secret Muslim and birtherism). I don’t mind arguing against Obama’s policies or tactics, but if you want to do so, you probably need to…

If you don’t like a 2 party system, then you need to change things in a big way. First, we can’t continue with first past the post. We need a different electoral system than what we have. Ironically, the founders all said that they thought factionalism was the most dangerous thing to our country, and then did…

Exactly this. He would have lost some votes. It would have been closer. It might have cost him his closest of margin states. But it wouldn’t have swung enough, mostly because there’s a big group of poor, white, rural and small town people who would vote for Satan himself (oh, look...) if he promised to reopen their…

To be fair, there’s a big overlap in the “Berniebro protest” and “Stein voter” Venn Diagram. It’s not a perfect circle, but they share a lot of area.

It was meant to give the south a greater voice. The EC is an appendage of slavery. Part of the slave power of the south that existed prior to the civil war was that even though a lot of their population had no political voice, they were counted to give greater voice to the slave owners.

So what, then, is the function of the EC? If the EC isn’t there to exercise their own judgement (which they have done before), then why is it there at all? Is it just to disenfranchise voters in every state large enough to have more than 3 Electors?

I agree that Trump is and will be the president. I don’t know if that’s for the best or not. I know that from a “systems of electing presidents” perspective, it’s probably better(?) but from an “oh shit, oh shit, we’re all going to die perspective” I’m not convinced.

Impeachment is not, and should not be a political tool. It’s a means of proffering criminal charges against the executive branch who is supposed to enforce law. It’s how to watch the watchmen, essentially.

“Refusing to honor the state’s vote subverts democracy”

Electors are chosen by the parties. The way the EC works, you don’t vote for a president. You vote to send the electors who will be pledged for one person. The parties chose their electors, usually as a sign of party favor, to promote the awareness of some up and coming politician, or to reward someone for donations…

Yeah, Jon Stuart had O’Reilly and all manner of other people on the show specifically to try to burst bubbles, to strengthen the argument against them. If this kills the Daily Show, then it’s not Noah’s fault. It’s because they’ve always tried to expand the conversation to be a conversation, rather than just yelling.