adamarmour--disqus
Adam Armour
adamarmour--disqus

Sigh … maybe some day.

I just recently rewatched it after a 10-year gap or so. Still scared me.

If it's anything like the adaptation of "Under the Dome," they won't event attempt it.

I watched this over the weekend and thought it was pretty delightful. The movie plays straight-faced with its dumb premise, but with the faintest hint of a smirk. It's fun.

"…man, we love editing those fuckers" is my current favorite piece of writing. What it lacks in eloquence it makes up for in truth and profanity.

I think the best episode of the show, so far, has been the season 1 finale. It had a great balance of being goofy and kind of scary.

This is pretty fascinating.

I can hear a lot of her father in her vocal delivery. Good stuff.

I disagree with Mrs. Rowling. They are obviously real wands.

There's no way Russell gets into a pissing contest with one of his costars. He stands on his marks and says his lines.

Everybody knows they're both Fred Savage. They all are.

Just backing up your statement. It's less about rewarding the injured party than punishing the party that did the injuring.

That's how I read it. I thought it was a good article.

Fintastic.

This is one of those movies in which I totally understand what people like about it, but I didn't enjoy it all.

"Turbo Kid" is the real winner here.

It may not be an original trick, but it sure sounds great.

Ha ha. Fair enough. I mean, people love it (and I count myself among them). But "North by Northwest" it ain't.

The movies that need remaking are those with good ideas that almost … but not quite … get it right.

This is such a dumb choice for a remake. It's neither a beloved classic nor a near-miss with a great premise. Make no mistake, I love "Road House." I'll watch it any day of the week. But I love it because it's cheesy, over-the-top and sort of terrible. It's totally lovable because of what it is. You can't remake that.