You said what I was trying to come up with.

If Peck wanted an audience of just gay men then he should have written the article in a publication primarily read by Gay men, by writing the article in The New Republic he clearly wanted to get his fucked up POV to a wider audience-- this is the response he either wanted or should have been able to predict. 

The idea that monogamy is some kind of heteronormative conformity is all you need to know that this guy is a fucking idiot not worth listening to. If gay men were somehow not real gay men if they didn’t spend all their free time twirling  glow stick nipple tassels in a berlin leather club, no one would give a damn…

As a gay man who is not gay the way most stereotypes tend to portray gay individuals I’m mildly upset to understand that my quality as an individual would be judged on a scale based on how much I embody stereotypes. I guess that makes me what the writer refers to as an “assimilationist” (although I have never thought…

Peck’s column popped up in my newsfeed on Saturday and I read it all the way through. Within its text, one thing became clear to me (me: a 57 year old gay man who went through the early 90s in NY and LA - and all that meant, too): Peck is stuck in a time and place and suffering from arrested development. I’d wager…

I am so tired of this “it took him 33 years to come out.” Are gays supposed to come out the moment they are born? Jesus Christ this is so fucking stupid.

I wonder though, if even evangelical christian women secretly hate him for doing this; because it’s so extreme. A lot of those women actually have jobs and in those jobs, work with men. So it might actually hurt him. Then again, it is Mississippi.

No, it's not that. It's worse. The Billy Graham rule isn't because you don't trust yourself (or your spouse). You do it because you are afraid of being falsely accused by some gold digging trollop. Which all women potentially are, of course.  At least the ones who aren't at home where they belong. 

The Right definitely views trucks as having more rights than women.

Oh, there’s coffee but it’s instant...decaf.

Pretty sure the Mayans were right, the world ended at the end of 2012, we just didn’t notice.

We go to Superhell, where it’s exactly the same but there’s no coffee.

What’s with the comically oversized shirt? What’s with the glorification of his personal victimhood? Oh right: Republican. “The party of personal responsibility [and bad tailoring].”

My truck. My rules.

TFW you use an individual’s poorly-informed (in terms of viable sources) understanding of their family history as delivered -by members of their family- as means to dismiss them.

I could, pretty readily, get into Bernie’s litany of “and then the GOP found this bit of kindling,” but I’d rather leave it at: the dude’s an…

No one else in the comments is freaking out about his fucking ‘prosecutors “should have explained to the girl and her family that pressing charges would destroy the boy’s life.”’ bullshit. He’s literally saying that these people should have cared more about this fucking rapists life prospects (which I assure you will…

“You made me do it!”

“Later I plan to attend a baseball match with my common man friend and fellow Never-Trumper, George Will.”

“They come here to eat our delicious roast beets and sausage stews that we eat for our single meal a day. They take our jobs shucking iron in the Steel Crop Fields of which we make our careers. When we come home to listen to the daily radio telecast, they are speaking a different language.”

I think slapping someone who is sexually assaulting you is actually pretty damned restrained. Seriously no apology needed, Tim McGraw. You weren't the one in the wrong here.