If you’re offended by the sight of a child at a table near you, perhaps you should avoid child-friendly restaurants.

I’m an editor in the financial industry, and I work on a lot of papers/articles/etc. about millennials and banking, millennials and debt, and so forth. Millennials and Gen Y are consistently used interchangeably. I actually have a paper open right now that begins with:

The unshakable belief of so many Christians that they are not only an oppressed minority but the only oppressed minority will never stop being funny. See also, white men.

I paid ~$80 to do a Wisdom Panel DNA test for my dog last year, because I had no idea what breeds he is and I was really curious (he looks like a German Shepherd puppy, and the shelter classified him a Shepherd/corgi mix).

Reminds me a bit of the reaction to Elliot Rodger, who left a 50-page manifesto explaining, in so many words, how his shooting spree was motivated by his extreme hatred for women.

Oh, my god, so incredibly sick of bicyclists on the sidewalk. The sidewalks in my neighborhood are very narrow, which means someone on a bike (or a skateboard) takes up the entire thing. Somehow 95% of them think this means they own the sidewalks and everyone else should just get out of their way. I’m on the street a…

It’s amazing how these guys never think that it’s wrong for men to have sex for pleasure. It’s only women who become irresponsible dirty sluts when they have sex for any reason other than procreation. And somehow it never occurs to them that if women actually followed their rules, they’d be limited to baby-making sex…

I’ve read that article 5 or 6 times and I cry like a baby every single time.

I definitely eat at Chipotle more often since going veggie. It’s too pricey to justify on a regular basis, but sofritas are pretty damned good.

If you read this exact article, word for word, in the National Review, or from a conservative WSJ op-ed columnist, can you honestly tell me you’d think it was satire? That you’d think it was making fun of conservatives, and not simply stating a conservative position?

Not a fan of South Park, big fan of King of the hill. And I have a very dry sense of humor. I just don’t see the point of satire that is only considered satire because of who wrote it or where it’s published. This article could be posted perfectly seriously on any number of right wing sites, and absolutely no one…

I think that’s only in Catholicism. It’s one of the reasons the fundamentalist church I attended growing up claimed Catholics weren’t actually Christians (also Catholics don’t worship Jesus, they worship Mary and the pope).

That was a popular Republican argument about insurance. “If you don’t allow insurance companies to sell worthless insurance plans, there will be so many fewer insurance options for poor people!” The disingenuity is impressive.

Don’t forget the dijon mustard. That guy was the WORST.

I’ve never understood the point of satire that’s indistinguishable from what it’s satirizing. 

Both my parents died before age 60 — my father didn’t even make 50. This is weirdly comforting to remember when I think about retirement.

I don’t really do social media (no Facebook, Twitter, etc.), and I don’t cut off all digital activities because I read e-books on my iPad before bed. But in Trump era I’ve learned to avoid news and politics in the evening. Being enraged and/or terrified is really not conducive to a good night’s sleep.

This doesn’t have the racial aspect, obviously, but people like to pull that bullshit on vegetarians, too. There’s a whole subset of YouTube videos where people give their “friends” food secretly laced with meat, wait until they’re done eating and then gloatingly tell them they’re not vegetarians anymore. It’s really…

YOU HAD ME AT HELLO.

Tomatoface was a quality troll for awhile, but their shtick was played out years ago. At this point it’s just kind of embarrassing.