Could also be the fact that she was a bad character. JarJar got the same treatment and nobody called people out for being racist.

The Joker was only polarizing for critics and certain media sites that fabricated some narrative around the movie. Clearly the audience was unanimous in their appreciation for it.

“I can’t admit I was wrong"

Or they dislike it for legitimate reasons. Trying to write off other’s opinion while acting like yours is objective is what comes off as emotional.

Its the same thing from the other side though. Unfortunately the small minority of people from each camp keep stoking the flames of this movie.

The only thing TLJ revitalized was the hate.

With a 43% audience score on RT I’m pretty sure they are the majority.

And a 43% from the audience. Sounds pretty contrarian.

Do they actually have the legal grounds to pursue this? I'd understand if it was the source but relaying information doesn't seem like a justifiable offense. Feels more like oppression of speech. 

I think their assessment of her not being a good person in the scene is justified. Threatening to rip someone’s hand off, robbing them, and robbing a store aren’t respectable things. Honestly I don’t think people would be that perturbed by it if articles across the web weren’t praising this scene as “Brie Lardon…

Dicks are just easier to draw and more noticeable

Pretty much. It was kinda mind blowing how slow they were with the old updates considering that they usually weren’t packed with content. The aquatic update alone dwarfs most of what they've made.

I think they said that trying to run the system in it’s current state was to demanding so they had to go back and rewrite a lot of code. Still pretty damn aggravating though. It's been two years. You'd think after a billion dollar purchase they'd invest a little more money into it to speed things up.

Which in turn are met with scorn from the murder apologists.

I’m not sure I understand. You claim killing is okay so long as the cultural finds it morally acceptable yet say make a list of justifiable reasons for it excluding personal beliefs. Which one is it? Because the only time you’ll ever be justified in murdering someone is to defend yourself and I strongly disagree that…

There’s about as much of a difference between games that have murder in them and are about murder. Meaning little to none beyond rating.

Well that’s my point. No one cares about murdering people in videogames. There are literally millions of games that make it the goal. Yet murder is one of the worst crimes you can commit.

In that light how are most violent video games allowed on the store? Most of the context of those games is "go kill people". The only difference is that everyone's been desensitized to it. 

It definitely is weird when you consider it, especially when a lot of violent games out there can be quite nauseating. If porn, scat, and murder are allowed on steam in any combination why is this particular one a problem?

What about publishing a murdering game?