I'm saying it can't go both ways. Either you're for equality for women, all the time, or your against it. You can't just say your for it, and then support people who do that cause a disservice.

But they argue about Planned Parenthood domestically at well. Who provide abortions, and receive federal funding. Look, I'm all for abortion. It's a much needed service, one for women's overall right to their body, and two because overpopulation and poverty are real issues. I just have a hard time grouping the…

Is your question about why their rights would be under attack from Clinton? Trump has attacked women's rights? Please don't talk about government funding of abortion related services, that's already supposed to be illegal. My point is that Clinton poses as a strong voice for women's rights, LGBT rights etc.. But…

Yes, people no longer need help. Those people weren't donating in hopes of favors from the state department or the eventual POTUS.

Ah, that's why we have elections. Since it didn't work out the way you think it should, you should just make up a bunch of social issues to blame your need to protest the results of the election on.

They don't need it. Do what they want. I don't care. I just don't like it when people pretend they're making a big difference, when really all they're doing it cheering themselves on inside their little bubbles.

She was the Sec of State. So it's OK to take money from them for a privately run foundation? Nice logic.

But that's what everyone keeps saying. He's going to take away the funding for women's health. When the only things he's actually put forth talk about abortion related services. So if the government can't fund it by law, why is everyone so upset about this funding? It doesn't make it illegal. And I like how you skip…

I bet. And they'd all be out there if he didn't win as well.

Because taking money from the Saudi's and Qatar, while championing Women's rights and equality for all. Is hypocrisy at it's finest.

I thought this was about the suffering and oppression of women's rights for hundreds of years?

This is all about the Access Hollywood Tape from 11 years ago?

This is all about abortion?

It's not about personal enrichment. Even though the Clinton's became exceedingly more wealthy after running for public office. It's about the notion that all this money is going for great causes, and it's all logged and notated correctly. It's not. It's a big shame. And you have to ask yourself why, after losing an…

Yeah, I don't agree with the treatment of conservative women by women on the left. And my wife is from Iran, had to flee in 1984, and finds these protests for women's oppression a little misguided. I guess if you're not from America, you have a different view of what actual oppression and inequality look like. Not…

Perhaps you'd like to give a reason as to why you believe Hillary Clinton would have been good for women? Apart from the fact that she's a woman, and supports government funding abortion?

"since Mail Robot’s recent acts of treason probably preclude its tracks from being extended into the vault, there’s no Mail Robot tonight"

Pretending democrats and Clinton were champions for women's equality, then acting like these protests are all for the oppression of women's rights, but knowing that they wouldn't be going on had the democrats won, and refusing to say they're really protesting because they don't like Trump, is hypocritical. Unless of…

Or, people actually don't like Trump, but also can't stand liberal hypocrisy?

Yeah, saying there'd be no women's rights protest after Clinton wins election. That's just a hypothetical.