Censoring yourself and using analogies that actually relate are totally different things.

What? I'm pissy? Because I don't think Trump is Hitler? Because I know about WWII? Because I'm not in Congress affecting government? What is the point you're trying to make? Usually in back and forth discussions, people try to make points.

We've spoken before?

My point, knowing much about Nazi Germany. Is that Trump is nowhere near a Nazi. But, people that didn't vote for him (myself included btw) like to throw out terms they know nothing about, and act like everyone is a racist bigot. Pretty ignorant if you ask me, but hopefully they'll just keep writing articles comparing…

If any of you actually knew anything about Nazi Germany, we wouldn't be throwing the language around just to insult the new POTUS that you don't like. (I didn't vote for him)

Yeah, Trump is a Nazi. Good one.

Ludwig isn't bad at all. He's much different than Fimmel, but really, so is everyone on Vikings. That's why Ragnar was the center for so long. But with the characters they have (Bjorn, Rollo, Lagertha, Floki) and Ragnar's sons (especially Ivar) it's still a very strong cast. There's no reason to sit here and point to…

The only way to have the Vikings rally around Ragnar, and carry out his revenge, would be for him to die. And that's what they did. Hopefully it works out.

But how can he seek revenge successfully when everyone has moved on? Everyone had their own organic growth, and to have them just run back to Ragnar to fulfill his wishes after he abandoned them for years following a terrible defeat he lead them in to, it just wouldn't make sense, beyond having Ragnar stay on the show.

I was always a big fan of Ragnar from the very first episode of this show. He was really the main reason I kept watching for 3 seasons. But Ragnar wasn't fun to watch in S4. So unless they decided to use him losing his mind and all of his passions for Viking life, as just a way to kill time before he eventually…

Yeah man, Ivar is definitely the closest we have to Ragnar. I wish he could walk and fight like the young Ragnar. I hope the show does justice to these other characters without having to worry about compelling stories for Ragnar.

The show introduces him as a stray boy that Caitlin wants nothing to do with. He gets sent to the Wall, and his whole story on the show is basically an afterthought until the Red Wedding. And that's the end of S3.

Game of Thrones has killed off probably 10+ main characters. Some all at the same time in the same place. Jon Snow was never the main character of GoT until recently. He was the forgotten child.

Exactly, don't know how he got those wrong.

Must have been difficult for the creators of this show to kill off Ragnar and effectively end Fimmel's run as one of the most interesting leads on TV, but it was without a doubt, necessary.

tried livin' as a wise man

We didn't see MiB rape Dolores. He just closed the door, and went to her with a knife. That's the point, there's more to it, he didn't just rape and kill her, or that's what we would have seen.

Every show this guy reviews, he does it the same way. Constantly complaining that nothing means anything. We all know that with serialized TV shows, that by the end, each episode prior has it's own set of conversations or events that mean more and are much easier to see. Constantly complaining every week that "The…

Lagertha will unite the brothers' Lothbrook. I don't know how many episodes are left in this 2nd half of S4, but you have to figure the brothers uniting to avenge Ragnar will be the next main focal point. Without Lagertha, that story carries little weight, as we're just starting to care about the grown Lothbrook…

I'm thinking it was Cindy from the all girls camp. She finds Alexandria and Tara, becomes friends, joins groups together, now there's plenty of weapons.