And the serious miscalculation that demanding an apology from Draymond could possibly be a winning move.
And the serious miscalculation that demanding an apology from Draymond could possibly be a winning move.
But do you think these consequences are making any of these people less racist?
Funny how lowly rated CNN, and others, can criticize me at will, even blaming me for the current spate of Bombs and ridiculously comparing this to September 11th and the Oklahoma City bombing, yet when I criticize them they go wild and scream, “it’s just not Presidential!”
They are likely just playing dumb. You don’t owe them any further explanation.
I can’t stop laughing at MUST BE CHANDED
“Avenatti is an opportunistic shitfuck,” said The Noble Renard.
The idea that his “success” representing immigrant mothers is due to his white male status is particularly egregious.
I think it’s more likely that he would startle the family in the raft, causing them to react physically toward him and then his armed security guard (you know he has them) will shoot one of the family members in the raft with impunity.
Hi--I don’t know how to submit tips to the Root, so I offer you this here:
She working toward the white utopia where there is an actual holiday dedicated to offending black people.
I know it’s hard to imagine with our current president, but the whole idea of the nuclear football is to make sure that nukes *don’t* get launched by an impulsive asshole. The codes are always with the president so that he (a presumably level-headed civilian elected by the people) is the one who decides, instead of…
It is with him at all times--not just for negotiations.
This seems like the least ridiculous aspect of nuclear weapons.
It’s a briefcase that contains various codes and shit that the president would need to use in order to give instructions to launch a nuke.
I think “on fleek” refers to eyebrows only.
That’s how human interaction works: if you disregard other people’s feelings and insist on continuing to do something after receiving overwhelming communication that it is offensive and hurtful, people will opt to not include you in their social circles.
I think there is some legal principle that you have to “protect” your copyrighted works, even from small uses or else you might be deemed to have waived your right to pursue bigger copyright infringement claims.
I dunno—he tweeted those things when he was a pre-teen. So like 12 y.o. or younger. Kids that age are complete idiots. Those tweets are certainly offensive, but I have faith that this fellow can be redeemed.
Every hairdresser ever, except for the one I currently go to, has always given me “the Rachel” no matter what I say I want, or what photo I show them. It is hideous on me, but irresistible for hairstylists, for some reason.
“The offer and exposure would have been great for Rihanna...”