There are certain interactions it is better not to film, like a conversation with a confidential informant or some crime victims who could be placed at additional risk if they are known to have spoken with the police.

I wish I could downvote this

I think the split is a supposed to be good president/bad president rather than Dem/Repub per se, although it is clear where the painter’s sympathies mainly lie.

Lol k - Did you mean to respond to someone else or something?

22/23 is a bit odd, but there is an increasing consensus that the brain continues developing judgment/maturity faculties to about 25, so there’s been a push to treat that as the legal age for adult-type responsibility for crime in terms of sentencing (that is, you can be charged as an adult at 18 (or younger), but the…

Holy shit learn to write, you fucking semi-literate imbecile

jesus - do you need a hug or something?

This isn’t really 100% correct though. Building codes (as the term is usually used) are creatures of state law. The president cannot pardon a violation of a building code, because the president is not sovereign vis-a-vis state law. The governor could tho

Agreed - but if I were USA and knew this is what was on the table for the state charges, i’d be looking to contrive that federal jx hook somehow.

Fucking Christ - can someone please teach the man how to tie a tie? Getting ridiculous

JEFFREY is a great record

Wow - assuming this exchange is basically representative, I’m impressed by how much the British know about the particulars of their navy.

The latter, per SCOTUS: “A law enacted after expiration of a previously applicable limitations period violates the Ex Post Facto clause when it is applied to revive a previously time-barred prosecution.” Stogner v. California, 539 U.S. 607, 632-33 (2003).

Next time, just put the word “snowflake” first so I know you have nothing interesting to say without having to read the whole moronic sentence. Thanks!

Right? What a creepy and tone deaf comment by the lawyer.

I was praying for guilty, but haven’t followed closely enough to weigh the evidence presented by each side, but I have to point out: that absolutely is *not* the standard for a criminal case. The defense bears no burden whatsoever. All that matters is whether the state proves every element of a charged offense beyond…

/r/accidentalrenaissance

Cool, thanks! Gonna watch tonight

Been meaning to check that out - sounds like you recommend it?

You really didn’t understand their point? Or just being a dick?