aburneraccountforbernie
ABurnerAccountForBernie
aburneraccountforbernie

You’ve made the same mistake as those who suggest what the Democratic party needs is a grass roots movement in the form of a liberal tea party. They forget that there was nothing “grass roots” about the tea party; they forget that it was funded and engineered entirely by the party’s wealthy donors.

What message do we send by enthusiastically lining up behind a butt that we largely disagree with? There’s no box on the ballot to differentiate between “I would take a bullet for this candidate” and “I don’t trust you as far as I could throw Chris Christie, but the damage you will cause isn’t quuuiiittee as long-term

If I had a nickle for every time I heard someone say “This election is not the time to exact change” or “This is the most important election in our lifetime”, I could afford to run for president myself and have enough left over to buy half the seats in congress.

Just think of them as being ahead of the curve...as far as the effects of our future of lead poisoning go.

If I’m falling, I’d much prefer to land on an empty concrete slab than into industrial meat grinder. Besides, we know she doesn’t have any plans on improving the safety net. She may say “give us time to make it better”, but her list of donors says “not until we’ve squeezed out every last dollar and drop of blood”.

Possible Spoilers? (I’ve only read halfway throught he books, but been spoiled so I could be wrong?)

Is it the “science people” or the “crap reporters” that you should be ignoring? If you dug down to the studies and viewed them in the context of a field of research, that’d be one thing. But since we’re talking here, I suspect you’re getting your science from a summary of a NYT piece done by a gawker content provider,

I’ve never seen them used interchangeably. Queue is for when you’re in a line; cue is for when you’ve forgotten one.

I know! I guess I get what they were going for with the theme of growing older, but I could only watch it halfway through before the theme modulated and...nope. Nope nope nope.

You seem to conflate the right-wing fever-swamp scandals and the left-wing position complaints. If the dialogue in the Democratic primaries focused around crazy-talk of Bengazi or Vince Foster or any of a hundred other things Fox makes up to keep their viewers tuned in, that’d be fair. However, you’re conflating that

Voting with the party is what got us to this point. The every time we’re let the fear of whoever the Republicans nominate scare us into lining up behind the DNC’s series of rightward-shifting candidates we let the opposition continue their descent into madness. While I’ve voted for each of the Democratic candidates in

So...engaging in vitriol of your own is, what? “Hair of the dog what bit ya’”?

I’m rather looking forward to some point in the future when, as the background music for a Beethoven biopic’s trailer, they use the opening notes of his 5th symphony, but...trailerized. Ba ba ba BWAAAAAAAAAAAA.

Wow. It really looked like you were being reasonable and tactful until the end there. I guess the mask just slipped.

Ok. Let’s start this off polite. I’ve been raising a stink about disenfranchisement for nearly two decades. My ire isn’t something new or specific to this instance. And it wasn’t a complaint about it being a closed primary; it was a complaint that thousands were dropped from the roles, something you claim to be

The word isn’t “forget”. It’s “purged”.

Nah, can’t be. Liv from iZombie only changes her personality once a week.

Wait, we had Leslie Odom Jr. and Hillary Clinton on the stage and neither of them sang the words “smile more, talk less” at the other!? Missed opportunity doesn’t begin to cover it.