absentiainreason
AbsentiaInReason
absentiainreason

According to CNN, the policy change means that all speakers moving forward would have “to have on-campus sponsorship by a recognized organization for external speakers.” A spokeswoman for the university, Amy Smith, expressed concern about “fringe groups and hate groups” coming to campus in order to cause the kind of

They’ve been blocked at being able to freely express their hatred toward other Americans. Now if they could only get being able to freely express their hatred toward skin color, their lives (under god) would be fulfilled once again... like they were able to do back in the 50's.

Christians are a disease

It’s all about who/what get’s the clicks and reads. That is what KellyAnne does. It’s got nothing to do with legitimate news, it’s just making folks read. They won’t divorce that - EVER!

Yep, anyone making 200k & up are hammered. They are often above the AMT limit but don’t have the resources for the deductions that wealthier folks have. It’s not hard to be poor and make 300k a year. In particular if you are business owner. Those numbers are often gross receipts not profit for your income. That is one

A flat tax is one of the most idiotic ideas for a new tax code. All it does is fuck over the poor hard, very hard..

Flat tax is the only option, it’s fair, it’s simple, stop all the non-value added costs like tax accountants and lawyers... saves a ton of money that way too. I don’t have a bottom with deductions first. Makes good sense to me. But money to politicians is like slop to hogs, line up and trough it’s never enough.

Hell $10K candian is like 75 cents US right

Not daylight here until after 7-7:30am from Nov-Feb w/no DST. I normally leave the house 6-6:30am because I usually try to be in the office by 7am, gives me time to stop if I need to. If I am going on-site to a customer, often I am out of the house before 6am. My wife leaves for her job @ 6am too. Hour of daylight at

Agree 100% — still leave for work in the dark either way .. to at least see some daylight at the end of the day, much better.

Of course everyone should contribute, but when you can’t for whatever reason (like say, being so sick you can’t actually work), the system should not kick you out.

So do people born rich “deserve” to live in opulent wealth because their parents were born rich because their parents were born rich because their parents were born rich because their parents profited off slaves or stealing land from Native Americans or what?

These statements are mutually exclusive. If you declared bankruptcy then you took advantage of one of the largest social welfare programs America offers. You took and took from your creditors well in excess of what you could afford. And then when you couldn’t pay it back you whined to the courts and abandoned your

What if they CAN’T contribute? What the fuck is wrong with you?

Oh...so...nothing except for the protections afford by bankruptcy laws?

If you really think no one gave you anything and nothing came to you by chance, then you truly have no idea what civilization is, or what you’re fucking talking about. Poor people should just sit and stare at the wall, then, and can’t have any fun or anything nice. Go fuck yourself.

Earn what you get? That is a cute thought but it simply isn’t how America works. A large portion of success is often pure luck of birth and circumstance; not hard work.

Everybody deserves basic human rights. Of which healthcare is one.

No, we all get the point he is making, which is, “poor people deserve nothing nice and simply surviving should be enough for them. If they don’t like that then we should let them die.”

I did everything right. Final bill that insurance paid out? $300,000 (!!!). Oh, and my portion due to deductibles and items not covered: $12,000. And that was with *good* insurance.