It's true; sorry, Erik, but this is the Internet, where we need to react viscerally and right now.

IF YOU CAN HEAR THUNDER OUTSIDE RIGHT KNOW BE AWARE THAT IT ISN'T A STORM IT'S ME SHOUTING SIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIMMMS! TO THE HEAVENS.

UUGHHHH

SERIOUSLY GUYS NOW YOU'RE JUST MOCKING US WITH THE NO GAME OF THRONES REVIEW THING.

They're just doing this on purpose, now.

I KNOW RIGHT

THIS WAS A FINE EPISODE OF TELEVISION BUT WHERE IS THE GAME OF THRONES REVIEW I NEED TO REACT TO SOMETHING.

@avclub-33807fbc68d335db8080d3c10cb78822:disqus  Valid points, and I don't disagree with your issues with Moffat's narrative style; I simply don't mind them, because I feel like he hits the character/emotional notes really well.

It really is the food of the gods.

OK, honest question: Why? What about Moffat's writing or vision or whatever so greatly displeases you?

I like to think I'm a fair-minded guy who can appreciate multiple viewpoints (even if they contradict my own), but that honestly sounds like lunacy to me.

Seriously, this is a thing? There are people out there who don't think Moffat's the best thing to happen to Doctor Who in like forever?

Of course bow ties are cool. Just like fezzes.

Oh god that would be amazing.

John Hurt.

Me too, but this is pretty much the best news possible for a West Wing notification, other than "Aaron Sorkin & Thomas Schlamme are reviving The West Wing and the entire original cast is also coming back and also Alison Brie will be coming to your house to watch it with you and feed you hazelnut gelato".

There should be a reason why someone made the decision to set the scene at in a situation where people realistically wouldn't be wearing clothes.

Yeah, I mean, I'm certainly hoping it's that.

Yeah, she's really attractive, but I'm not sure what point her nudity served.

I don't really get your point.