The ethos is weak (and clumsily defended), the exposition itself is insubstantial and asinine, and the utter sloppiness of the writing is simply inexcusable for a published author (still struggling with "your" versus "you're"? Really?).

@Arggh! there goes a...snake a snake!:

@LindaJeanne:

@Aaron Senecal:

The Inception nod at the end took the cake.

@njdevil spinky spank:

@mountaingnome: Bow-chicka-wow-wow...

@Bwehngamun:

@Zinger314: Email clients delivering and fetching mail for Yahoo mail accounts interact with the mail.yahoo.com subdomain directly on a regular basis. I would imagine this factors pretty heavily into the equation.

@bdkennedy1002:

@slagmire: C'MON BRO, 1 AND 2!!!

Well, that's all well and good, but how come every time you come around my sandy, sandy bridge wanna go down?

@magliotti: Yeah, because that worked out so well in the past.

@SynthOno:

You Ahmad, bro?

Dear GOP:

@Tyrunn: Might I suggest, in light of the leaks, that EVERYONE LAUNCH ALL THEIR NUKES RIGHT NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

What if they sign up for a—wait for it...

Alternatively, here's a great gift for the person in your office that types really quiet.