Do take the time to read the entire memo including at least including a glimpse of the references. The memo is PRO-diversity and even explains why everything should be read in the context of a set of distributions with greater differences (deviations) between the same gender population than between woman and men as…

Which one? Sexual dimorphism?

At least some disagree: http://quillette.com/2017/08/07/google-memo-four-scientists-respond/

Exactly what perspective did he endorse? You went on total offense and insult before he even made his perspective known. That is typical of the left, and is part of the ‘attack them, they’re different and don’t believe’ mentality the progressive SJW employs.

I think that guy has a basic misunderstanding of a few facts. There is the fact that in most of the civilized World, women control more money than men. In Japan, most of Europe, and a great deal of the U.S., women manage most household expenses, and work the budget for major expenses. But control does not mean…

As long as we apply one of your ideology’s most regressive prerequisites to limit how the discussion is conducted and pre-invalidate any unapproved conclusions we might otherwise draw, we are welcome to have said discussion?

Is this statement true at all? Sony, Nintendo, Toyota, Samsung, Asus, LG. These are all HUGE tech companies where the power is largely and almost exclusively with non-whites.

And you might be surprised that 100 years from now what you think is “right” is “wrong” or not fitting with how people interact at that time. We change as whole when the new method works better time tested. If it doesn’t, then it doesn’t. And by better, I mean what’s considered beneficial at that time. That’s changed…

As long as the discussion recognizes that power in large tech companies still fundamentally remains with white engineer dudes and white finance dudes.

What perspectives are you talking about? Have you ever considered that you’re wrong about something? And have you ever considered that you wrong position can hurt those you’re trying to help, minorities? If your an advocate for minorities and helping those less advantaged, you have an obligation to consider where you…

Fail. Those facts continue demonstrating their veracity, which is why they didn’t need to outlaw opposing views. Your nonsense can’t withstand scrutiny, so you apply censorship and persecution. If your ideology were correct, you’d be lining up to overstay your visa in a flourishing Marxist Moscow, Pyongyang, Phnom…

Welp, this is gonna be a fun commment’s section.

Summarily dismissing the screed as being “anti-diversity” is exactly the problem it was outlining. Ms. Conger, it’s difficult to have discussions with people that prefer to affix labels out of some misguided sense of moral superiority. Listening to other perspectives, whether you agree with them or not, is just part…

well it’s obviously not good enough.

I have a minor correction to suggest. This line:

David, I love your writing, and have learned a thing or tow about cars from your David Dissects videos, but I’m disappointed that someone so knowledgeable about vehicles overlooked some crucial facts about specialty vehicles.

Maybe you’ll do this with another newer 8+speed 1500 truck and run the same *kind of* test for comparison? Otherwise, we get it. You don’t like the Raptor and would prefer if others don’t like the Raptor either because you say so.

David, you’re mathing wrong. You believe the Raptor got 9.4mpg average for the trip. In actuality, the 9.4mpg figure is for the Willys AND the Raptor together, so it has to be doubled for the actual MPG each, which means the Raptor actually got 18.8. So there! Especially because the Willys got infinite MPGs while on…

TL:DR...... Ford gave David a truck to use as a support truck. He got it stuck. He guesstimated the weight he was going to tow and came up with a hypothetical MPG figure he was expecting with achieve with no basis in reality. The truck did not meet his fuel economy expectations when towing an unknown weight over…