I think the real problem is labeling EVERYONE who disagrees with the SJWs a racist, or a bigot, etc. It starts to cheapen the meaning of these words, to the point where people stop giving a shit if they’re called a racist or a bigot. This is bad, and harms the victims of actual racism, sexism, etc. because their…

Or they are simply “blow up the system” populists. If you are against the current system, being anti-Hillary is pretty easy. I didn’t vote for Trump or Clinton - third party for me - but it doesn’t take a rocket scientist to see why Trump would be favored by a subset of Warren/Sanders supporters.

The DNC torpedoed Sanders. There were a couple emails and news stories floating around about it a few months ago.

Gee, the one unifying theme in all these was a dislike and mistrust of Hillary. Something much of the left agrees with. Someone remind me why the DNC pretty much anointed her as the nominee again?

You forgot the biggest problem... It’s NOT AMERICAN! Why not buy American and support OUR economy? We already have a massive trade deficit with Japan, if you hate America so much you can’t be seen in an American car, at least buy something like a European car...

can you make cogent arguments or do you just spew non sequiturs?

hey now, maybe im alone here but i only go to 4chan for /wg/, its generally conversation free and has a seasonal thread going

That’s as idiotic as saying it’s bullshit that people can’t only be on this site network for electronic reviews or game reviews; they have to embrace the politics and sportsball and fast cars and whatever they do over at Jezebel. I use 4chan for the fallout and elder scrolls /vg/ threads, /k/ for shooting the breeze…

What bullshit. There were CHILD PORN subreddits. There were subreddits on how to rape people. There were subreddits filled with pictures of dead minorities. Please stop talking crap.

Worse than Coontown? Come on.

Hey bud ... this is not about YOU.

You’re clearly not doing any thinking.

aw sorry pal, that’s something you just have to do for yourself

How about “so therefore it’s unlikely to be racially motivated.”? Why is the fact that the subject is wearing a hijab more relevant than fact that the interrogator is also wearing one?

In the event of potential imminent danger (as is portrayed in the scene), Miranda Rights can be withheld:

Um, yeah, but the one is BLACK in a hijab and the other is WHITE in a hijab and she’s getting that black AMERICAN SASS laid on her, Beantown-style!

KHOMEINI 2020

Well, is it still not an interesting omission, if not a deliberate one?

Except Samer failed to mention the other person saying the line is also a women wearing a hijab.

“It’s a film that will expect its audience to cheer as a woman in hijab asks about her rights and is told, “You ain’t got shit, sweetheart.”