That's exactly my point: she could be a great running back for all we know, but there is no way she is going to be putting up real points against men that are 2-3 times heavier than her.

She obviously had to earn her way onto the roster. The team isn't going to pick her up or put her in the game if she wasn't at least competent, let alone not bad.

She isn't "bad," either; just really REALLY overmatched.

He traveled.

I'm not, hence the second portion of my post.

You say "quite frequently", which worries me. I understand that this scenario isn't rare, per se, but I would definitely consider the actions shown here to be generally uncommon, to the point that no one would consider any combination of three examples within a notable span of time to be unworthy of concern.

You Won't Believe This One Crazy Thing Italian Soccer Player Does After Goal!

Counterpoint: pubic hair?

If you want to get technical, the direction that his feet are facing on landing is essentially the same as when he starts the jump. It's maybe a few degrees off, still, but it's definitely not 90-180 degrees away from a full spin.

It's pretty obvious that anything attributable to a "kicking motion" came more from the defender bumping his knee, and even that is minor.

I still don't get why this is a thing.

Yeah, but can he do it over a Kia?

Back to Gawker with ye.

Bulls lose a great player in order to save some money until the new draft picks get converted into busts.

Counterpoint: Whoever beats the Eagles at the Philly opener has a huge chance of winning the Superbowl (since 2009). While the Chargers probably won't go all the way, they were basically guaranteed a berth and first round win after beating the Eagles.

Sorry, but the default status of government owned land is not to mess with it without legitimate benefit. The onus is then on the person who wants to change/use the land, and the government is usually pretty cool with stuff so long as an impact statement is presented and the appropriate funds are flowing.

You need a legitimate reason to cut down trees on national parks property. "Snyder wants to cut down trees on land he doesn't have any claim to for purely aesthetic reasons" is probably the worst rationale.

The proper usage is to dissuade people from stupidly writing off your comment as homerism. "Wilson is an underrated QB" and "As a Niners fan, Wilson is an underrated QB" carry different weights.

You should put Hochuli in the flex, obviously.