Verily. There's a fundamental incompatibility between gaming controls (viz. control sticks) and internet usage that handheld makers aren't owning up to. Are you going to give us a touch screen? No? Then you might as well just leave the browser out.

Back when the iPhone first came out, I liked the idea of internet-in-my-hand but was a philosophical "resister"—I said "Hell, no, I won't Apple!"

Yes and no.

Kudos to you for including "Robot Jox".

*The year is 2027. The world as we know it is unraveling after fifteen years of economic meltdown and widespread global conflict over dwindling natural resources.*

I liked the Bayonetta cosplay a lot.

How about "source_of_shaun_the_sheep_for_....com"?

Mmm, Golden Axe. 1987, at the South Shore Bowl-a-Rama. Takes me back.

New muppet movie, I think. Don't exactly know. Senorgif "Muppet Bounce" is the title.

Y'know what? There's room for this. In a world of endless "gritty" cloned downer-browner fantasy/zombie/apocalyptic/survival-horror/superhero/gangland/etc worlds, all promising tiny meaningless increments of graphical improvement (yeah, because I know what "draw distance" or "polygon counts" are and care deeply about…

To all the people hoping this will be a console rather than handheld title: My own intuition says you shall be disappointed. For several reasons:

Darn, you can't own the Most Romantic City on Earth.

Here's the expanded, full-length list of PS1 games I have fond memories of:

You don't say.

Say what you want about mind control, at least you can usually *see something happening in the real world* which is my requirement for being interested in any super power. Compare that to "psionic attack" which seems to add up to someone staring really hard at someone else.

Can someone explain why in a world where Power Girl—and most important *Power Girl's outfit*—exists there is any justification for Supergirl?

Mmm, if Bea Arthur were still alive, she'd have one heck of an inbox.