I'm not going to stop enjoying Star Trek: The Motion Picture. Not to belittle what he did, which is horrible, but that was Stephen Collins who did that, not Will Decker.

Yay! I won! I won!

Also, while I hate to be so picky, Kirk said that in one of the films, but the image of the Enterprise on the shirt is from the TV series.

Even as someone who is not at all into sports, I found this was an enjoyable read. Thanks for sharing it!

ESPN's statement would hold a lot more weight if it elaborated upon what the reason was then. Not following his account, has there been anything else on it recently that could be taken as in any way objectionable to ESPN's interests?

I don't follow sports... but here is my question. Is the Twitter account Keith Law is using a business one provided by ESPN, or a personal one? (And if Law only has one that he uses for both, why would anyone, who might need a separation of business and personal interests, do that?)

I fear I only just discovered this story, and don't have the desire to wade through the (at the time of this writing) 920 already existing comments... So if this has been said by someone else, forgive the repetition.

The phrase is universal. The issue, of course, is that in the world of text based communications, we loose important tonal cues such as inflection, or facial expression / body language of the person who is "speaking." Your post could have been read in one of two ways, straight or sarcastic.

Totally in high school:

Can't tell if you are being serious or sarcastic, since some of the characters you posted do have some visual similarity... Yet, even in those cases, you have proved they don't make 'em like they used to, because even with the similarity, I can tell them all apart very easily and see them as quite visually distinct…

I really need to see that one one of these days! I was excited when Right Stuf licensed it, but I just haven't been in a position to be able to pick it up yet.

Present Day...

Man, if there is one thing I miss in modern character designs, it is noses. Not that I think we need to go full Escaflowne or anything...

Multiple comments seem to be arguing the point that only the queens lay eggs, or mentioning the scene with Dallas in the Director's Cut and saying, "Well, which life cycle you believe in depends entirely on which version of the film you watch!"

I don't usually try to get into the online grammar correction business... But when you incorrectly contradict someone who is correcting such an obvious error, I must counter correct you. And so:

I wonder if they will find it strange how much he resembles Lucas Lee?

Well, it wasn't as if she was the main guest, so she wouldn't have been in the TV listings. She was one of those, "X shouldn't do Y. Here t do Y is X," guests.

Fair enough. Goodbye.

I'm sorry that I am not a frequent poster (and thus you don't recognize my name). It is my way that I only reply to something when I feel I have something specific to say that will add to a conversation. I don't post just for the sake of posting.

Well it is your column, you can post whatever you want. And if you really want to do that just to spite me because I expressed displeasure towards one column (while making a point to say I usually enjoy it) then fine. Guess I'll be back in mid January!