Robin Thicke skeeves me out. I just get major creepy jerk vibes from him.

If there is one man for whom no panties should ever drop, it's this skeezy misogynist.

She turned it into A Thing so she could blog about it in the hopes of getting a deal to write a book that gets optioned by Reese Witherspoon to be made into a horrible romcom. It's all about the $CAKE.

Women who can make a decent pie don't need to prowl 50 bars with baked goods in hopes of finding love. #Pie4Life #ohSNAP

I can't watch the video on my iPhone well, but I read some transcript:

My understanding is that this is a mischaracterization. I don't believe that a case of bribed jury has been taken to the Supreme Court, and it's entirely possible the same reasoning that applied in the Aleman case with the corrupt judge at the 7th Circuit Court might apply.

Yep.

She's just so obviously biased that it fills me with impotent rage.

Especially since her husband is a lawyer! All the lawyers I know had something to say about the case when it came into national spotlight. The lit agent and the book deal is just a little too quick of a turnaround. This is so fucked up.

"these people"

A sneak peek at the made-for-tv movie.

The fact that she called him George and believed every part of his story shows how much she identified with Zimmerman. She saw him as a sympathetic person. She was asked if she felt sorry for Trayvon and responded "I feel sorry for both." Her point of view was completely about what Zimmerman's rights were. Never has…

For a juror, she certainly didn't pay attention. The 911 operator said that she cannot give instructions like, "Stay in the car," because of liability issues.

Don't worry, I think she just feels inadequate towards everyone at her communication skills.

There clearly needs to be a law that jurors cannot profit from their service on a jury. I have no doubt whatsoever that this woman lied about not watching the news and not reading the newspaper so that she would be more likely to be selected—and be able to cash in later. This just keeps getting worse and worse.

Was she at the trial?!?! The 311 (not 911 because it was the non-emergency number) dispatcher testified that they aren't allowed to give a direct order "stop following him" and so had to go to the indirect order "we don't need you to do that".

I am disgusted by the fact that she is desperately, blatantly using this trial, and the death of that poor innocent boy, as an attempt for her to make millions of dollars with her "amazing tell-all story".

Thanks. Perfect. (still learning the way of the gif)

Soo..she set a murderer free because she's a racist and had plans to cash in on a controversial ruling. Horrible human being, yes? Yes, okay.

Good?