Come on! That took a long time for Selena to come up with and she was really proud of it.

Wait, so what the fuck actually happened in this case? Law and Order plotlines make more sense.

Umm no. Manslaughter is still illegal. George Zimmerman still committed manslaughter even if the jurors didn't understand how to think.

By "lacking toughness," what they mean is she sounded the alarm about financial derivatives and didn't just suck the banker's cock. The Fed is like the ultimate pro-business government agency. It's not even entirely public.

It should be illegal to let the best writers of a blog quit.

The two members that are in jail also participated in public acts of sex and masturbation as forms of protest. One of them walked into a grocery store and took a chicken leg and masturbated with it. The other one had sex in a museum to mock the rising birthrate.

As Zimmerman's de facto defense attorney, the first question you need to establish for the internet jury is- what possible motive would Trayvon have for attacking Zimmerman? If Zimmerman struck first then he is guilty. If Zimmerman tried to detain Trayvon, he is guilty. If Zimmerman frightened Trayvon in any way to…

Okay, now you are making things up. I never said Jeantel was a poor witness because she was nervous.

Honestly, the SYG laws don't even matter. That is your problem. They don't matter. Zimmerman didn't use a SYG hearing and jury instructions were ever going to matter with racist jurors like B37.

Your argument is that Zimmerman has reasonable doubt. I provided evidence to show you how there is no reasonable doubt. I pointed out that your disregard for this evidence comes from a racist perspective. That's not an ad hominem. You keep ignoring the actual facts and for some reason choose to beliebe Zimmerman's…

Recheck it.

First of all, there weren't ad hominems. It's not ad hominem when your entire argument is based on a priviledged understanding of events. You consistently ignore any analysis of Zimmerman's story and merely declare without evidence it supports reasonable doubt.

Lost in your and many other lawyer's analysis is that the prosecution could have presented the case differently and that any reasonably analysis of the facts clearly shows George Zimmerman as both the aggressor and of using unreasonable force.

AHAHAHAHAHHAHAH YES YES OH MY MOTHER F-ING GOD YES. AHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAH

Thye look like hairy penises with little arms ro help rub your clit during sex

WOW, that line of reasoning makes me think she really did rig it to lose. Holy shit that's stupid.

She introduced the video.

Technically he called 311, not 911, though the juror says 911. 311 is not allowed to give direct orders because they could be held liable if you are injured for following them. The operator testified to this at trial and she did not take notes apparently.

"You don't need to follow him" is what the operator said.

Oh. That makes sense.