Well, if there's one guy who can be seen as the voice of reason in all of this it's Howie Felterbush. He knows all there is to know about incorrectly fingering someone.

I fail to see where my praising the art style somehow translates to your making up an idea that anyone is supporting it purely for their being a female lead character.

Whereas it reminds me very positively of Marc Hempel's art for Sandman: The Kindly Ones.

I like the MM videos from seancody.com and corbinfisher.com. Those sites are problematic too, in that they're basically "gay for pay" (although there are puh-lenty of videos where the men look like they're extremely enthusiastic and not just putting up with it for a paycheck) and the men are almost all…

I'd agree with that analysis, although I'd argue that porn can still be woman friendly even when there isn't any woman on screen. Personally I love m/m and solo male stuff. For me, whether something is "female friendly" is all about whether it accommodates the possibility of a female gaze.

Similarly, "girl on girl" is usually targeted to straight men and involves weird women licking each other's tongues. It can be pretty gross. Apparently straight men like that?

Porn is awful. There are very few sex scenes where a woman truly has an orgasm. Women hardly ever give really real positive feedback so you are pretty much watching a women get raped. Most all porn actors and actresses are psychopaths. It is best just to never watch porn, not because it is morally wrong but because…

Free female-friendly porn is hard to find. X-Art is good example. You pay, but its worth it. The women are very natural-looking, no obvious plastic surgery (none of them look like they have breast implants) and little to no makeup. The men are fit and attractive. The videos are usually around 12 - 15 minutes…

am i the only girl who feels a bit silly talking about actual real-porn? i'd feel goofy searching for movies.

i prefer amateur stuff on like xhamster because f*** paying.
i've never seen legit, made by professional porn.

also, i'm into m/m stuff wich is crazy hard to find anything good because the bottom often doesn't…

I've heard X-Art does some pretty artsy fartsy female-friendly stuff. The actors are attractive and wear white (for some inexplicable reason), it never gets too rough (no choking or hair grabbing) the music is indie-ish, natural lighting is used during shoots, and you won't get that grating, over-dramatic porn moaning…

http://nymphoninjas.net/

I'm a girl I used to work in a porn store.

"Female-friendly" is a really vague term. For some people, it can mean, "Production companies that don't have really rotten track records in the ways they treat their female performers." For others, it might mean, "No rough stuff." For still others, it might just mean, "I am aroused by this."
That said, you might…

pornhub has a female friendly category.

You think someone noting that a white, uber-successful celebrity chose an unusual name for their kid is a case of classism and xenophobia?

Really? My very first thought was "Yoby? His name must be Eyob, which is Ethiopian. Connie must have wanted her son to have a name that reflected his heritage. That is awesome and Connie Britton shits rainbows."

Aw come on now: a little charity here. We live in a world of "Wyler"s and "Jaykup"s. I don't think it makes someone a dick for never having heard this name and assuming that another celebrity made up a name for their kid.

not to mention that his work affects policy making.