XBody1994's discussions
Explore our other sites
  • kotaku
  • quartz
  • theroot
  • theinventory
    XBody1994's discussions
    XBody1994
    XBody1994
    XBody1994
    PostsDiscussionsSaved ArticlesFollowers (1)Following (0)

    I don't smoke so I have no dog in this race. I'm simply pointing out the extremes people will go to in order to misunderstand correlation != causation. Non-organic food has chemicals and all food has rat feces in it. If someone is given a smoke at age 12 and becomes addicted, is that a choice? Modern food is terrible.…

    Could be from a bullet wound. Not proof.

    How do you tell if a smoker is unhealthy?

    Do you even drift? The Carrera GT is one of the hardest cars from that year and price range to drive. Have you ever even driven a Porsche? Do you understand rubber to bitumen frictional force physics? If you were pearl clutching any harder I think the head would turn purple.

    You can still hear the words. Your point is invalid. Do you even WolframAlpha?

    Please tell that to the millions of blind people worldwide using Audible or Narrator.exe on a daily basis that their worldview lacks subtext. If you even looked at the Natural Language latest resources you'd know it is more than capable. +1 for Dragon though.

    Sure it does. If you actually saw the movie or read the books like me, you'd know that she starts off shooting at twelve years of age. That is why I included that study. The only sound I hear is that of a poorly constructed argument from the perspective of burden of proof.

    You don't even have the calculations necessary…

    Do you even bow-hunt?

    27 degree angle from a distance beyond the arch climax point using an 18-20 poundage target bow that she could barely handle. She would require a bow that she can't accurately shoot.

    This isn't even a debate. The director agrees with me if you read the original article. Do you have a director to agree with you? Her Olympian bow trainer even stated she was getting sore from a basic 18-20LB force Olympic target archery training bow. Do you even know an Olympian?

    This is how irony sauce is made. Ellie. In the December 2012 edition of Elle magazine the measurements are given from her. Do you believe a person with an Olympic bow trainer isn't a valid source of information about their own body in combination with size comparison plugins and journals for MatLab to accurately…

    I know right? Isolating variables with controls is so backwards. I don't even know why they bothered. Clearly you should show them how to successfully science. Your feeble chin touching can be sensed from thousands of miles away as you discover genealogical database websites to compare and contrast lineage of well…

    Do you even PubMed?
    I have over five papers submitted on the angular velocity of urine and blood through every documented labia size known to woman-kind and their effect on the endocrine system.
    Every bow-hunter knows this but clearly you're just pissing in the wind.

    How can you even ask that from a stance of scientific inquiry? Of course we aren't multiple people.

    Clearly you're right

    Clearly you aren't engaging me right now. I'm sorry you are offended by the best analytical English language algorithm extrapolator software known to human kind. That really isn't my problem if you think are engagement what was based on false pretenses and our being obtuse.

    Under the laws of supply and demand, the seats to consume a movie are supplied while Pixar fills the most demand for any production house this side of the Mississippi. Does your watch even have a calculator? Add that shit up.