XBody1994
XBody1994
XBody1994

That's so two point touch. Now we have the three finger swipe.

Why should we hope she has cited better evidence and reasoning? These men are the alleged victims of sexual harassment and discrimination and she sounds like an asshole. I thought it was generally bad form to side with the alleged perpetrator of the crime when it comes to gendered situations like this.

Bullying and exposing someone for being a racist dickface is not the same thing. If this person is trolling, then they need to take responsibility for what they write on the internet WHILE showing a picture of themselves.

I only caught the tail end of the article, but your comment is hilarious.

You honestly believe that's a gotcha, don't you?

Did you miss all the other lines talking about the type of food and compounds within them? Did you miss the part about exercise programs? I used the France example for a reason. To some extent, calories in = out does hold true. Please show me how to lose weight while having a 20,0000kcal-day intake. At some point you

The only difference I see is method of delivery. This is due to the fact that certain foods provably contain addictive substances. Just because one person reacts differently to proven addictive substances does not invalidate the general rule for the vast majority of people on earth. Look at France. They are being

I don't smoke so I have no dog in this race. I'm simply pointing out the extremes people will go to in order to misunderstand correlation != causation. Non-organic food has chemicals and all food has rat feces in it. If someone is given a smoke at age 12 and becomes addicted, is that a choice? Modern food is terrible.

I think people judge smokers harshly because we know what is in a cigarette. Even if you smoke, you should be able to admit to yourself that the chemicals in a cigarette are pretty terrible. We know what is in each smoke. If you want to put that into your body... That's fine. It's your body and you can do what you

Could be from a bullet wound. Not proof.

How do you tell if a smoker is unhealthy?

Do you even drift? The Carrera GT is one of the hardest cars from that year and price range to drive. Have you ever even driven a Porsche? Do you understand rubber to bitumen frictional force physics? If you were pearl clutching any harder I think the head would turn purple.

Do you even bow-hunt?

27 degree angle from a distance beyond the arch climax point using an 18-20 poundage target bow that she could barely handle. She would require a bow that she can't accurately shoot.

This isn't even a debate. The director agrees with me if you read the original article. Do you have a director to agree with you? Her Olympian bow trainer even stated she was getting sore from a basic 18-20LB force Olympic target archery training bow. Do you even know an Olympian?

I just want to interject to say that I am now going to use, "Do you even bow-hunt?" as a way to shut down an argument.

"Do you even bow-hunt? Do you understand the physics of a compound bow?" is going to be my new best thing to say in every argument, ever. Thank you for inspiring it.

You have obviously never bow-hunted before or understand the physics of a compound bow. I shoot a Martin Pantera Magnum with an extremely high poundage rate. Have you even studied the history of what the qualifications were for English longbowmen? Only videogames and movies use such laughable tactics to make weak

I'm so glad someone as smart as you presented empirical evidence to prove your point instead of anecdotal stories and opinions that matter not in terms of "is it possible". Please don't ever be a scientist.

Are you such a Luddite that you believe we won't be able to create actors and actresses that are more real to are perceptions than actual humans? So close minded. Ever watch a Pixar film? You know, the greatest per movie production house in the world? No actors. Please use better logic.