Too long didn't read. All I took from that is you have nothing to prove the scientists incorrect and are dancing around it as a dog pokes for food in the air.

Wrong, that was directed at the person that inserted the word actor after the original point about stars. Can you even scroll or are you just on that Merlin level twitching?

Pointing out flaws in auto-correct in a debate is like and able bodied person using an electric wheelchair without a motor.

I'm saying it should be, not that it is.

If you actually read what I wrote, I said they weren't STARRING in anything. Starring is visual.

How often do people fly to their work? Most people drive. See the difference? Maybe if you went to the MPAA website you would know these things. I'm sorry you aren't interested in American cultural protectors as it leads to…

Show me where I said otherwise or form a new point.

It is very simple to create a valid point. Whatever you were going to post, do the opposite and cite your sources if you want to look as alpha as you intend.

I see you are skilled at tube insertion and little else.

Maybe use a crossbow if you ever go hunting.

Laundromat? Wincycle?

The first or second comment after mine.

Pro-tip- when you debate, counts.

Of course not, Microsoft already made Narrator. Duh. Want me to read that back to you?

Two wrongs don't make it right. Even a blind squirrel is right twice a day.

You didn't catch my debate on the drag created by his ears?

Clearly you have no sense of elf.

This is what happens on a simpleton site that cares more about K-fed than PubMed.

You're right. I figured out a trick to age paper at will and stick it in the back of the last book on purpose.

Your fake geek cliché is almost as bad as your bow hunting rational. If you pay any attention to her pivoting and form, anyone should be able to see how flawed it is.
We claim to care so much about the native…

Not only do you over-chew it, but you totally ran with the only thing you know anything about.

V O2 max for starters, or any research study from ASFC/M.

Woah woah woah, i'm about to blow your mind.

125lbs is small. The average woman in America is 166lbs.

It is so great that you equate sexism to fat or body shaming. You're talking about half a problem. It is called intersectionality. How do you make so many posts with that one track mind? You're raging over a minor point about a descriptor, without having anything that matters to say.

I think this STEMs from the fact…

You should research that term before you use it. You mentioned you didn't need to, but it is clear that you don't share the same knowledge appeal.

For it being turkey day, your posts have an awful lot of pork.