They keep trying to bow-jangle my arguments instead of dealing with facts.

You seem under the impression that you are a psychologist or have empirical evidence in an attempt to move the goalposts like you're employed by Gillette stadium.

I'm talking physics and you're trying to run 21 questions about non-points like the riots after Rue's death not being included made the movie lame. I'm sorry…

Obviously you've never heard of pixelphelia. You must be a real square not to keep up with these things.

Let's science.

Realistic body image and type for the task at hand is a feminist issue. Look at any videogame with the same feel as this story. Clearly you're using half the debate to pretend the other doesn't exist within this context. I'm sorry you don't understand that their are many feminisms.

Maybe you shouldn't have had so much…

Please have a seat over there, with the other people that don't understand compound bow physics while you soak in all that bullshit assumption sunshine.

Bingo. This. Is. It. Exacty. Now, add a twist of hypocrisy from Jezebel and a dash of misogynistic tropes about manic pixie agile archer sci/fiction and = perfect. It cuts two ways.

You don't get to decide if it cannot be both. That is a logical fallacy. It is amazing how many of you form complete points directly from fallacy. Did you not pay attention in college?

I have, did you not get the uploaded pics?

She could not make any but two shots described given the movement context at the distances portrayed or shown, including the apple sack, but excluding her first hunt for food. You are asking the wrong question because you obviously don't understand physics. The distance, FPS, and angles of the shots while moving are…

Yes, yes I do. Yes I have read the book. I never stated WINNING is impossible. Show me where or admit defeat. Show me where I said her winning is impossible. Do it.

You are ignorant as to bow-hunting and assuming she can make those trick shots in the movie. You are ignorant as to different bow types and their usage…

Do you have any logical point to make, or are you going to continue to defend a misogynistic practice within consumable media?

Reading is Femdamental .

Please, continue to defend the internalized misogyny of the author and call I art. That works out so well in the gaming industry for the manic pixie agile archer girl stereotype. Her body composition is unrealistic for the role, regardless of what that moron author believes to be true.
Did you also flame every…

Which is the same logic used to defend sexist videogames that display unrealistic body types of women in specific roles in fake environments that aren't even real women. Pick a side of logic please. I'm simply pointing out that Jezebel is being hypocritical in this regard. The author is an idiot who doesn't know…

I am well aware, thanks. I'm stating that due to physical aspects since she trained on an 18-20lb Olympic target bow and was sore and tired that there is no way she could do that with her body type, especially with a wooden homemade bow, and later the bow made for her (you forgot to mention there were two and one…

Please re-read the original post if you don't understand. I have a problem with the unrealistic body type portrayed. The author gimped it, along with originally a "home-made" bow and other horrible choices. It is physically impossible. It is the standard misogynistic manic pixie elfish trope that they whine about in…

You are correct. That body type is far more realistic for hunting and killing with so much movement involved in her shooting style.

Hint, you made more than one comment. Of course I do, I brought it up.

Then obviously you'd understand how hard and exactly how much velocity it would take to make those trick shots while running and landing at a left 27 degree angle? It would take around 250-350FPS, depending on which distance frame is used, and at minimum a 150lb draw. These are trick shots, not pull and pray. Trick…