Please show me where I made up anything. Nice ad hominem.

No more critical than Jezebel is regarding unrealistic body types for the position in video-gaming. I'm pointing out a flaw in Jez logic.

Too bad that isn't traditional archery. Those are high poundage trick-shots. In order to aim those trick shots and keep the velocity up, you need a high poundage bow. She was also running with it, which would require more broad shoulders to keep the tensile strength intact for the shot. In one simulation for one of…

I'm snotty because many people spent many hours simulating all of this already. If morons cannot understand variables surround sports they obviously don't participate in, that isn't my problem. It isn't my job to educate people who don't understand physics and stayed hungover in anatomy 101.

False equivalency.

This is physically impossible in her case, given her weapon of choice, shoulder width, draw poundage and literally a hundred other factors. In most of her trick shots she would need upwards of 250-350 FPS and 125-150+ poundage. She was also running, which is where that width would come in. She has an unrealistic body…

Nice fallacy list there through false equivalency.

...He was genetically mutated. Within the context of those variables you would have to show under the burden of proof that it wouldn't be possible to genetically engineer a human to do those things. You pick the worst examples ever. It was regarding her actual physical stats being able to do that with a bow.

Hate to correct your obvious misunderstanding of film terminology, but you cannot see the people which means they cannot be starring in. Please look up the definition of the word starring. You are being fallacious through syllogistic principals regarding starring vs acting. You cannot star in a film that has pixels as…

She said starring, which is visual. Actors can be either.

Caught me :\

The problem is that while you are correct, that logic does not fly within Jezebel for other forms of consumable media such as videogames.

Both

If that is the case, apply it to videogames as well, another form of media... and one that doesn't even have real people in it. You cannot however, because you already chose your opinion on this. Hypocrisy smells so nice with turkey.

My issue was more that the body type is unrealistic for the action in question, and would be flamed if it was done in a videogame as the "manic pixie skinny archer" making trick shots that would require a much wider set of shoulders, which some women have, just not her. It would require around a 150LB draw and far…

That doesn't mean the troll was not factually correct. I was trolling Jez for being inconsistent with realistic body images that would not fly in reverse with the gaming community logic they put forth.

Wrong, in fact it is the opposite. It plays into the manic pixie scifi and fiction trope of women. The opposite of this is being debated within the gaming community, which is why I pointed out that Jez is giving them a pass.

Obviously not a bow hunter. PubMed is a wonderful source for kill data.

My point if you read the original post was actually about the pass Jezebel is giving on this old trope of the agile manic pixie, instead of a realistic body type for the position given the context within the book or movie. On the other hand, Jezebel expects this from videogames. Sad that no-one caught that.

No, no SHE cannot. Other women and some men? Yes. Those trick shots using that bow with her frame and that 40-50 poundage? No. Impossible. It is the manic pixie agile sexist shit all over again with an unrealistic body type for those shots. It would require at least a 150lb, and she'd have to be moving. Given her…