You can thank Samuel Adams.

Actually, she uses both a compound bow and a longbow within both the book and the movie. 15 stars were given to you by ignorant people. Please check your fan card in at the end of the line.

You should see what Nvidia and Sharp are working on for 4K and 16K display recreations. We're there, just not on a mass market level. The problem at that point is pixels and the way we use wireframe models :\. What can you do.

You do understand that everyone moved the goal-posts instead of addressing my point? Yes? The research is well documented, please continue to tell me about how a 40-50lb line longbow with her body mass and short shoulders can pull off trick shots like that while moving. The simulations have already been done, and…

The strength requirement to kill during a trick-shot is far greater and requires more than her 40-50lb wannabe trick killing bow. It is physically impossible while in motion, at minimum her shoulders need to be wider with more lean muscle mass. The bow has already been identified and also recreated. You're debating a…

She already admitted what she meant... you need to read.

Do you even bow-hunt?

Correct, but not in the way that she did. By eliminating the variables of motion and a few others, from a standstill where she can sit there and pull back? Sure. The books are surprisingly detailed, but the writer (and in this case producer) did not do their homework.

I posted no ad hominem to you, but appeal to hypocrisy is a logical fallacy. Grasp that logic isn't discussed in a "logic class." Nice appeal to authority, but I have taken many Phil classes and the Phil of Math. Grasp that the same debate made against videogames isn't applied here, an is rooted in sexism against…

Logical fallacy.

I did. I pointed out the cherry picking of logic in the first post. Then everyone came foaming at the mouth without actually knowing what they are talking about. It reminds me of the religious right in many aspects.

I am well aware, which is why the debate originally was taken from AT to physics forum. These people are not.

In the movie and books she used two bows. It wasn't about drawing, it was about the movement shots and materials in relation to the outcome, not the device. The output not the input. She was making shots with…

Jezebel cares, which was the point I was making. The two basic points are hypersexualization of females in games and unrealistic body types and images for the result. I'm sorry if I did not make my point clear enough. There should be years of related articles if you search on the topic here.

It was regarding the technology behind techniques and multi-dimensional nested array models of voice synthesis as well as non-pixel implementation of artificial model structure to duplicate humans beyond the pixel. You should probably read a thread in it's entirety before removing all doubt so to speak.

Your logic doesn't work though.

Using your argument, the cartoon pixelated female type 3d models within videogames don't matter in terms of seism because they aren't real people. She is too weak for the bow used to kill someone at the angles presented at the distances presented within the movie and also (but to a lesser degree) within the books.

Which has nothing to do with the exact longbow, materials, physics, or strength of the individual within the movie based on her stats. The philosophical burden of proof is on you, as this has already been shown and literary nerds have replicated he bow in entirety... the stats are not pretty in terms of functionality.…

If intelligence is all that matters then why do people proceed with education that correlates beyond income benefit? I'm negging them for being such luddites as to not spend two minutes to stream studies as dmsg output on their screen or daily alerts via any method of programmatic condensing. This is 2013. I never…

We obviously don't want to play games that are just games. Scientists spend ample amounts of time debunking gravity because it is flawed for what it is attempting to demonstrate, as with this movie.

She used a compound and a longbow. I was comparing each to each, given the materials listed. This isn't either or, this just shows that you didn't read the book and didn't pay attention in the dumbed down movie, and also don't understand physics in terms of what has already been programmed and accounted for in…