XBody1994
XBody1994
XBody1994

Did you show her the two bows used in the movie and the wood spoken of in the books? If not you're comparing apples and oranges. Also, try to take down a moose with anything but... good luck. You are assuming incorrectly, the actual physics have been deduced from each scene already. You are over simplifying my

Nice ad hominem.

If you're asking a serious question you obviously don't follow the news or have an RSS feed. They sell statistical and facial (through formerly face.com) data and are also forced to have NSA web admin portals (Think like a router login). The flipside to the obvious rights violations should be a counter weight of

Of course I celebrate it. Those people could actually shoot arrows in those ways.

Nice ad hominem overload instead of proving your point with facts.

I'm honestly just sitting here making the Turkey and mashed potatoes ahead of time for everyone coming in the morning, while being mad at my profs and boss. It's sad and entertaining to see the average response from a nook that is supposed to be so enlightened and educated. Props to you for seeing the obvious. Time to

Please tell me what is pseudointellectual about being such an avid bow hunter and educated individual that I consider the arrow spines both dynamic and static, gravity, drag, aerodynamics, draw force curve, stacking, dimensional effects, displacement, average velocity, impulse, recurve, tiller, span, tensile strength,

So wait, you haven't even read the book... while telling my I have a fundamental lack of understanding? Killing is artistic? Perhaps half naked women in every videogame is artistic then? You are giving a pass to one art and not the other. Your arguments are using invalid logic through faulty premises. Your opinion

I love you.

I want to sensor ring your logic.

So? The same excuses are given with men that want to play grab-ass. My logic is the same regardless. Perhaps check yourself first. A common thought terminating cliché to dismiss aspects of feminism is exactly the line you used.

star

Wrong, but nice strawman in trying to project my feelings regarding an entire sex of people. In fact I hate this because of the same reason I hate hypersexualization and abnormal body types shown in videogames. This isn't physically possible and the book itself gives no reason from bow design, material, or ability for

Ad-hominem. Check

"staring" people, as noted by the reaction and typing regarding Pixar. Please read before you assume that my assumption was incorrect, when it was clearly correct as per her wording. Thank you come again. The word staring has a visual connotation, not vocal or auditory.

You did not account for a human with an adrenaline rush, the type of bow design which both were ancient in terms of power or modernism, and places in the movie where they individuals were shot, as well as how far in the arrow went for the correlating injuries and death. Please account for these variables as AND I

I would like to see your empirical evidence to prove your first sentence. Given the mortality rates, that is not true as you forget to account for miscarriages and mothers that died with the child. I can find no evidence that what you say is true, only to the contrary when all the variables are accounted for,

Videogames are just videogames with pixels and yet people have problems with their hypersexualization of pixels. Your logic is flawed. Do you have a problem with the idea or mathematical nature of most fallacies? If so, please do tell. You hold different standards for media so nice cherry-picking logical fallacy with

Notice that all the bows of high poundage and accuracy are by dudes with bigger arms, higher tendon strength, denser bones, and denser muscles than her. Sport compound bows are not the same as the traditional bow she was using. They also use lighter arrows than used. You obviously don't know shit about bow-hunting to