Love how consumers still don’t seem to actually care about efficiency.

They’re probably not selling it here because they’re losing massive amounts of money on each one.

Anybody have a link to in depth coverage of that event?  I’m looking for some quality entertainment on this slow Friday morning.

I’m old enough (sadly) to already be aware of that.

For God’s sake man, don’t adopt their stupid naming conventions. Just say “there will be lower priced Taycan models”.

There’s hilariously little about this car that’s green.  

5th Gear - yeah people love discounts and free stuff. Sure some EV buyers think they’re (often incorrectly) saving the world, and there are others that are early adopters “just because”, but a lot of people buy them because of the subsidies, and also because they know the automakers are selling them at a loss, i.e.…

I dunno what to say, they’re fine.  Go through brakes slower than an S2000 btw.

Not a tough call for me.

They’re coming out with less expensive versions that are under $100k.

In that they’re going after people just looking to brand whore and one up Tesla, sure. Anyone with half of a mechanically inclined brain, will probably be a bit insulted.

nah this is way worse.

I’m embarrassed for the Porsche of old with this Turbo naming. So, so stupid.

If only more would follow this lead.

The best kind of hybrid is just one that harvests kinetic brake energy and adds minimal weight.

What type of individual lets a perfectly good Porsche waste away in their &%#$’ing driveway? Wonder if they also burn cash on weeknights in their outdoor fire pit...

If BMW just now broke your heart, then you haven’t been paying attention to BMW.

“I could put a clean RX-7 up against the BRZ, some of the Mustangs, the WRX, various hot hatchbacks and other performance cars of today, and I know it’d at least hold its own. That’s a testament to how good these machines really were.”

I remember the good old days, when an optioned out Macan Turbo was $80k.

There’s no performance benefit, so....nope.