WhiskyTango1
WhiskyTango1
WhiskyTango1

Well, he is right about the Supremacy Clause. State courts are not bound by federal court decisions except by the Supreme Court. District and circuit court opinions may be persuasive.

I just posted this above, but it's a repeat - have a tailor measure you with tape, or look up a chart and do it alone. You'll be shocked by the dress size you fall into. You can especially tell with vintage clothes, which are built with standard sizing. Someone who wears an extra small or a vanity size 2 might

At what store? Most standard mall brand retailers use vanity sizing. Try looking at a tailor's chart and measuring yourself with tape. Or European designers. She looks like a toned size 14-16 to me, but she'd probably be able to fit into a size 2 a J. Crew or even a size small from Vince.

It's not really surprising to see this. Brands are aware it happens all the time and try to protect themselves against the appearance of "dilution." That's why some clothing brands will only sell to a certain number of stores in a given area. Maintaining the image of exclusion is important to many luxury brands.

A contract that violates state or federal law is not enforceable. Period.

In a healthy relationship, both parties typically discuss their course of action, and the man's input is taken into account. However, the law cannot dictate how people in their private relationships should operate. More importantly, at a legal and moral level, how can you justify forcibly requiring a woman to carry an

So much wrong here.

I remember reading that the actor who played Mark actually quit (under good terms, he was pursuing movies or something) and the writers were optimistic about writing him back in for guest appearances that never materialized.

Okay, you can stretch it over your foot. But can you jam it into a tight space repeatedly without it tearing? I've been with a handful of guys who were too big for normal-sized condoms, and I've only had condoms break with guys who were large.

It looks like its bent, with the leg following the path of the gauzy shirt and the foot behind the model to the left.

Can someone get fired for sexual harassment or sexual assault at your workplace?

Gawker and Jezebel were definitely blocked at the state level in Massachusetts when I worked at the senate and appeals court (2007 onwards). I had to use an IP proxy to get my fix.

He's confusing a newspaper with the government. Common mistake, given how often public figures scream "censorship!" at various non-governmental media sources.

Does anyone else find it extremely troubling to read this kind of article on Jezebel? What is the purpose supposed to be?

Dude, you never answered the question, or you seem genuinely confused about what reasonable suspicion of criminal activity means. A Terry stop/stop and frisk is a brief seizure under the fourth amendment. Reasonable suspicion is a legal standard for whether the police officer may stop and question an individual. To

Uber seems pretty intent on structuring their relationship as employer-independent contractor vs. employer-employee. Asking that they install an app that alerts them if a driver is behaving in a threatening or inappropriate manner creates a huge host of liabilities for Uber. Simply giving people the app would suggest

I asked you several specific questions, none of which you have answered in your response. Again:

You need reasonable suspicion that someone is committing a crime in order to stop and frisk that person. That is the constitutional minimum. What crime did the officers suspect this man was committing? What was the basis for their suspicion?

It's not that far from a military coup d'etat.

I think the content of the work and the actor's public persona make a difference. Cosby felt like a shocking a disturbing revelation because of people's emotional attachment to the Cosby show and its creator. People felt personally deceived or violated.