Just squeeze some lemons in a glass for a few days. It's all about starvation and water weight, anyway. I'd go after her kitchen utensils and spice rack. And her linens.

I find this kind of strange and interesting, as I find the acting from 40 years ago to be melodramatic and unrealistic. Compare Jimmy Stewart to Marlon Brando (who pioneered the modern acting style). The former performs like a theater actor; his films felt like set. Brando is subtle, natural. The modern actor is a…

Because they're happy to get any kind of conviction in a sexual assault case.

Why? This guy was a nobody. He was a nameless staffer. It's not as though he was an elected or appointed official. And it doesn't sound as thought the party or his employers were complicit in his crime or in covering for him.

I disagree with this - I think you can hold both thoughts simultaneously. Chris Rock isn't saying that he thinks these victims are liars, or that he thinks it's common for women to lie about rape. He isn't saying anything about these victims at all. He's talking about his own personal feelings of loss - the grief over…

That Justin Bieber wax figure looks exactly like Kate McKinnon playing Justin Bieber

Especially given how tight his comedy is! His standup presents like a thesis! Good Hair was a disorganized, shallow, misguided mess. Your points above are so on point.

And Good Hair could have been sooooo good. Why why why was there a half hour segment on that stupid hair cutting competition?

Eddie Murphy is still funny. He just hasn't had any good material of his own for a couple decades. Plus, he has an amazing history of recognizing and developing black comedic talent - including Chris Rock.

You're quite welcome, Hippiechick.

In Oklahoma, so long as one party to the conversation is aware that it's being recorded, there isn't an issue; there's only a dozen states where it's illegal to record someone unless both parties consent. Moreover, the recording may be permissible even in states that ban such recordings, for example, when the person…

It is. Under the rules of evidence, admissions of guilt are not hearsay. The only requirement would be authentication of the tapes (for example, the boy who made the recording would testify about how he made the tape).

I feel like he's stuck in this position where he can't admit to any wrongdoing, or even say that he would have acted differently, because it could be used in a future civil or criminal suit (the DA could seek an indictment again; double jeopardy hasn't attached).

You only need "reasonable suspicion" for a stop and frisk (also known as a "Terry stop"), which is an incredibly low standard. It's not uncommon for walking in a roadway where a sidewalk is available to be a citable offense, and it could be argued that refusing to obey the pedestrian traffic laws would entitle to…

We discussed it years ago, before we got married. He'll never share.

In my defense, the ogling comes after we get the late night pot munchies, plus he's a chef, so the grilled sandwiches are pretty epic. Last night it was a sliced ribeye sandwich with gruyere, arugula, horseradish aioli, sauteed onion, pan fried in butter. After I finished mine, I only snuck a few peeks at his.

Not drinking. It was a surprising one for me. We were two law school students really into each other, but the fact that I drank and he didn't led to some pretty big lifestyle differences between us that ultimately broke us apart. We're still friends, though.

Oooh. I am weirdly territorial about food. Maybe weirder than this guy. My best friend and boyfriend have both discussed how I used to take the <whiskeytango> third or their food. And get a frightened look in my eye when they ask me for a bite. I also can't help but eyeball everyone else's food. Like, I make my…

Perhaps he was confusing them with their 90's era doppelgangers? Cause they guys were cool.

I've heard the same sentiments from psychologists who works with teens and college students. I understand what you are saying, and it doesn't seem to me to be a judgment about the practices themselves, nor about individuals who engage in certain sexual acts. It not a "the childrenz" freak out, either. It's responding…