<i>"It's fair to wonder, Ms Faircloth, if you actually read the CNN article or if you just read the CNN headline..."</i>

So commenters on a blog noted for going against women being required to meet a single, unachievable standard are annoyed that the objectified males in the featured video don't meet their personal qualifications for "sexiness"?

We gay men are faultless, haven't you heard? We exist only to be a lady's magical sassy shopping companion so we can't be misogynists. Hooray!

What if maybe those women decide to break the gender role that women should stand there and wait for men to walk up to them? What if....THEY walked up to men?

OK, I know I'm about to be "that guy," but... isn't this kind of funny coming from a site that further popularizes plenty of neologisms like "mansplain?"

I agree with you, my boyfriend and I both have rather low sex drives and there was a point in our relationship where we were having more sex then either of us wanted to be having and it actually caused problems in the relationship and then we didn't have sex for a month and we were closer during that month of no sex…

How is that naive? I'm 40. I have *never* had sex when it wasn't fun. Yes, you can live a full life never ever engaging in un-fun sex. I recommend it.

I'm a woman and I'm on the same page as you. Sex is sex, and sex (outside of a handful of truly horrific experiences) is something I only do because it's fun and there's something I like about the other person. I've been in love with people and never slept with them, I've slept with people with absolutely zero…

i don't know why people are jerking on you, especially since this is supposed to be a progressive website. (where's you understanding, people? geez)

i, for one, am the same way. (and i have told guys i'm only interested in sex. they sometimes still get attached but i prefer to state my intentions.)

and NO i'm not…

i really don't understand what all the hate is about. the OP clearly said "i should do it once a week so he doesn't feel shitty all the time, just most of the time". at first, i thought it was sarcasm and pretty funny (it still may be). but saying you're ok with them feeling shitty "most of the time" is not really all…

Exactly. If you two aren't sexually compatible now, you never will be. Move on.

I totally agree with you, why do something that isn't fun to you? Why do some one that isn't fun to you? This is the reason a lot of marriages become sexless because one or both partners become bored. Sex should be exciting, fun, and fulfilling. If it's not you're doing it wrong.

As someone who was in a sexless marriage, I have go with Westmark here. If your partner's lack in interest in you leads to you being unhappy most of the time, it's time to get going, even if they do feel that throwing you a few crumbs once a week should keep you satisfied. My ex-husband went from once a week should…

You might be just assuming hes happy with it. More likely, hes putting up with it to not cause conflict...something which will only happen for so long until he cheats or calls it off.

I think what he's saying is the boyfriend should leave the girlfriend because the lack of sex with the overcurrent of so he feels shitty "just most of the time".

Why can't she make a video she wants to make? Because she is not really an artist. She is a product. She does not even write her own songs. The ones that designed her persona are the ones in control. Her money came as a result of their creativity, not her own. This is not the case for all pop stars. But it is…

Arizona's real solution: Grandpa driving Land Rover has heart attack, drives off road into cactus. Militia member 42 year old son living at home hears about it, goes to shoot Sikh who owns the local gas station.

And those are muscles you can flex on command. It's not like a heartbeat.

Was he making a statement about how some men feel after they are married?

I was going to say some men will go to any lengths to not go through with a wedding, before I realized it was not the groom.