They wouldn't need to buy all the outstanding shares, just enough for a majority
They wouldn't need to buy all the outstanding shares, just enough for a majority
but now it'll know if you're searching for info on the Jets' quarterback or if you're trying to find some ass to mouth action
thanks... that's what I was wondering. And yes, DDR is big over there but they probably wouldn't know what to do w/o the arrows on a screen so it's a catch 22
so does one do more work than the other or would it end up being equal?
couldn't they use some gearing to cut it down to a more practical number?
He'd look a little more impressive if his tank wasn't all fucked up
yes, I'm aware of that but the iPad 2 worked fine w/ 256MB total. Aside from the higher resolution, I don't think any of the other improvements require a bump in RAM
2GB is probably overkill for a tablet unless you want to do something ridiculous like run Crysis at that resolution. My desktop only has 1GB of GDDR5 that does 5760x1080 w/o any problems
the A5X is more Xtreme! than the A5
yea... I was being facetious
Isn't the extra RAM more for the increased resolution than for multi-tasking?
but then this phone would only cost you ~$2000
You have a point though these animations make more sense for a mechanical watch than for a phone. I think it's the "epic" music that really bothers me. It's only a phone—the only thing epic about it is the price tag
floating touch would be great on sites where you have to hover over certain items
So how much will it cost with a contract?
it's typical to file a lawsuit before an IPO. FB probably had several lawsuits filed against them since announcing the IPO
That's what I said
You're kind of making the same point
It's great that Apple is actually doing something but they'd be like any other company if it weren't for the public pressure. If all the recent attention were connected to HP or Dell instead, Apple likely wouldn't do shit about it. On the flip side, if the protests were connected to HP or Dell, people wouldn't care…
mostly what triple said. if you're shooting raw, you're tweaking the raw image data to get the look you want. it's kinda like developing your own film. if you use a p&s, the camera does all the developing for you