Yeah, but I would totally do Voldemort.

ooo faux lesbian making out. HOW CAN ANYONE BE THIS EDGY GUYS???

Of course not; that's why it's clearly just a joke. Jokes! I make them sometimes! (You may have noticed.)

Speaking as a former unpopular kid, I've always thought "popular kids peak in high school" is a total myth. Now the really viciously mean kids in middle school I do believe probably ended badly, because they probably had some messed up stuff going on at home. But the kids who were outgoing, bright, and athletic? …

Ugh! Self-important new-agey people make me crazy, like "empaths" who think they can feel your emotions, even better than you can, or the historical inaccuracies of neo-pagans. Worship however you please, but I draw a line when this nonsense trounces the legitimate scholarship.

You know, you say you aren't a fan of Melisandre, and I wasn't either at first. She seemed creepy and somewhat two-dimensional. But I'm beginning to like her more now.

Saying you respect a jury isn't excusing the death of the victim. You're making a connection that isn't there to excuse a response that isn't warranted.

Where & when has she excused the death of the child?
And EVEN if she had, how on earth does that make it reasonable for anyone to threaten the lives of completely irrelevant children?

I don't think she's excusing the death, though.

The phrase, "respecting the jury," means that she, as an individual, respects the verdict that jury delivered.

Given the facts of the case, and what the shooter was charged with (murder in the first degree), it seems unlikely that the jury could've reached any other…

I think you missed a few twists and turns in the stances and the attacks, but I'll simplify it by taking the stance that you think this article is taking.

The following conversations would make both Person A and Person B bad people, but Person B would be worse:

Person A: I hate minorities.
Person B: Let's kill Person A's…

It's difficult to get a conviction for Murder 1 when premeditation cannot be conclusively proven.

Had the prosecutor's office charged this jackass with the crime he actually committed (murder in the second degree), he'd have gotten hit on that, too. As it is, he's likely to spend the rest of his life in jail.

The guy's…

What difference does it make? She's a legal commentator. It is literally her job to have opinions. To compare "being paid to have opinions" with "killed a child" is absurd, and I don't feel like it should be necessary to clarify that her particular opinion in this case was liberal-minded.

Did...did you not read the article? It is in no way ok to threaten someone's life because you disagree with them, even if you disagree with them vehemently. Your opinion is an example of the problem highlighted here.

I live in a cheap, no Obamacare-having, ignorant-assed red state. Free vaccination clinics are absolutely everywhere. They are available in every single county. The pharmacies even do them for free. Cost is not the issue.

Well that's a new angle on the Big Pharma conspiracy! Usually the anti-vaxers claim Big Pharma makes money off vaccines that's why they force you to get them. I can't wait to start replying to those types of comments "No, you've been had by Big Pharma, they're behind the anti-vax movement to get everyone infected and…

Um....big pharma is not behind the wave of parents not vaccinating their kids. In fact, the anti-vaccination loons are much more likely to sound a lot like your rant.

You mean like this federally funded free vaccination program for uninsured children?

A good deal of the people not getting vaccinated are affluent dumbasses who don't want to risk their shitty precious special snowflake offspring with things they don't understand.