Vauche
Vauche
Vauche

Nice try there buddy. That was a decent attempt at satire/parody of my reply, but inherently false at its core. I only expressed my opinion that I felt it was in poor taste. If you don't agree with my view, ok, that is fine, you can feel that way, I don't mind.

Interesting... and based on your response I would say

So you're saying you climbed up to the controls of the gun, got inside, took manual aim with it, and fired the big gun with a trigger pull? Because he is saying the fact that he didn't do THAT was what was disappointing...

I'm talking tough? What makes you think I'm at all trying to appear "tough" on the internet? Is there a reason you feel so threatened by the fact I'm not at all phased by your sarcastic and vapid remarks? I am not the one attempting to put anyone down by calling them babies (which, if we were all a little more

I was 14 years old and in High School (in South Carolina) taking a class called "Occupational Education" where a major part of the course involved learning about guns of all sorts. Bolt action rifles, pistols, shotguns, and fully automatic weapons were discussed in technical detail, and at the end of the semester

Depending on the theater and the movie. Some theaters in Seattle/thereabouts are $25 dollars because it also serves as a relaxing restaurant, but you also have to pay for the food, which is also overpriced. And yeah, a lot of 3D movies are going for about $15

So he absolutely must be lying right? Because you seem to think so for some reason. What thinking have you locked yourself into that makes you unwilling to trust someone? The only evidence you offer that he is lying is that his opinion differs from yours. Based on that alone, I would say you are the liar.

If you think he is lying then that is a pretty selfish attitude you tote around there.

His opinion is entirely legitimate because it is his own. The fact serves to help him formulate his opinion, and because 343 promised HIM the world (his perception is all that really matters here) and delivered only a teaspoon of water left him with a disappointed view of the game. Just because you got exactly what

Much like your name calling and biased opinion of Tom's review? He painted a picture of his experience, and wasn't happy with it. What is your problem with that? Why is it that you feel so personally invested in a piece of art that any honest assessment of it comes off as an attack against you? Why would you feel the

His "example" is entirely true though, because it was his honest observation. Just because you disagree with his observation doesn't make him wrong, even if you observed the "correct" outcome from the beginning. If I were playing Halo 4 and saw a huge gun mounted on the back of a massive vehicle, hells yeah my mind

I realize the OR has addressed many of the VR concerns, and it is for that reason I am going to be getting one in March/April, but I realize I am also part of a niche (just under 10k people worldwide) who will experience owning it any time soon. The point was that the OR requires MORE innovation in the ways of

I think Azuredrak is thinking similarly to me. The creation of a marketable, affordable, and new combination of tech IS innovation, hence the Wii U gamepad is definitely a clear innovation. I understand the Oculus is a magnitude greater than previous attempts at VR, but it lacks enough oomph to be a huge disturbance

And you will continue to derive pleasure from talking down to people and chewing them out for their own struggles. When was the last time you ever had the urge to say something negative about someone and withheld long enough to consider their own point of view? What is the reasoning, motivation, and thinking behind

Don't get me wrong, the bikini'd torso is definitely poor in taste (because I personally would never want it on my shelf) but even the satirical post about the torso is in pretty poor taste.

You don't get to speak for others' level of understanding. The editor at Kotaku responsible for this post has poor taste in satire/parody.

Even this parody is in pretty poor taste though. Yeah, I get it, this editor at Kotaku feels like many who have expressed that the torso was in poor taste, but he took it a step further in the same direction.

Parody can point out poor taste, but even the parody is in poor taste

This is pretty poor taste at the least and frankly melodramatic.

You mean like Apple Sheeple? I think there are more Apple Sheeple actually...