Dark Souls was pushed by the media incredibly hard over here for various reasons. That's why it became what it did. The west sees a game like Metal Max with fairly anime-inspired art and just laughs at it and throws it away and thus it never gets mentioned and awareness is never piqued.

Still absolutely do not agree with Runner 2, Mass Effect 3 or Little Inferno.

It really is noticeably sharper. However, it never should have needed the patch in the first place. I realize everyone wanted to rush the game out and make launch but it doesn't inspire confidence from the consumer when you have to patch your game just to make it something it should have been from the start.

Apparently the way to get the most out of it is to buy one and a few games and then sell it. Some people are already putting out stories of spending $700 and getting back $1000 after selling it to someone else.

I'm the same way. If I sit down to play a game, I am sitting down to play a game. If I'm going to watch something, I'm going to watch something. It just feels like more ADD generation cellphone junkie stuff creeping in where it doesn't need to be.

The first case is often pretty short but as the games are around 25 hours long and have 4-5 cases, that would net you an average of at least 5 hours for a normal case.

Except you aren't telling them their story isn't interesting. You're talking about game mechanics "properly taking advantage" of gimmick ideas. They aren't the same thing and no, you don't get to criticize if you don't actually know how they could improve it because you have no baseline for what to consider "enough"…

No, I'm being realistic and logical. You can't just tell someone "your stuff isn't good enough" and then when asked in what way say "I dunno. You need to do extra stuff...somewhere. Surprise me." What that is showing is that consumers are apparently just really dumb.

Watching IGN's video of playing Mario 3D World through it, it's laggy enough to be unplayable.

You don't get to criticize something if you have no ability to describe a better way or offer an alternative. You can't just say "do better." Keep moving those posts.

Both Mario games support the gamepad through off-TV play and various other ideas throughout the game. Just because it isn't shoving them down your throat doesn't mean they aren't there or adding little touches to it.

It wasn't useless at all. It's actually faster and more sensitive to use the touchscreen in more than a few situations with many of the forms being easier to draw by hand than by stick. That's why you can use a mix. You're coming across as someone who died a lot on Easy and never really learned to play the game.

I never had a problem with it after around Mission 3. Everything past that I was just switching between touchscreen drawing and right stick drawing without thinking about it.

Wow, thanks for shittalking at me. I love having what I'm saying degraded.

And aiming anything at the "Wii U in general" has no place in a review for a singular game. Keep that garbage in an editorial. It has no bearing here.

Wonderful 101 took great advantage of its unique features and we've had many games use Miiverse in interesting ways as well.

Personally, I get the feeling people actually look way too hard for "justification" and then cry foul when it's both "underused" and "overused" at the same time. It gets kind of annoying actually. I'd rather see it just presented as an option. We're looking at the exact same thing that happened with the DS. People…

You can't purchase them. The registers won't allow it until Friday.

That is the worst opening line to this review possible.

So now can all of LoL and SC2's tournaments be over on that instead of twitch so twitch can actually be usable during tournaments? That'd be nice.