Uber1000
Uber1000
Uber1000

Conservatives are never against government subsidies when it's subsidizing their projects. Just like judges only 'advocate' when they make liberal rulings.

Unrealistic examples..

Define "stealing". Did my corporation put a gun to your head and make you buy our shoddily built equipment? Did you not read the fine print, in Swahili, backwards, on your contract that clearly stated you were at fault for the additional fees?

Kevin & his mom were definitely living the trials of Job.

Omagerd, you Libertarians and your 'We don't need governments we have a court system!".. as though the courts operate in a vacuum.

"maggot" comes to mind. "cocksucking maggot" would do.

Maggot, Agate, Rabbit, Packet, Jacket, Habit, Abbot, Zagat, Baggott, Daggett.. Sorry, you only get 10.

I'm thinking Alec is more of an improve, collaborate with the director and make the part his own kind of actor rather than the empty shell that carries around whatever persona LeBeouf programs into it kind of actor.

I think they meant that it would be hard to do a Wakanda movie where the black people are wearing animal pelts, tribal headgear and using spears but flying jets and rockets. So easy to fall into a racist caricature pit with that.

Hi, this lesbian would like a word with you.

So apparently what "welfare queens" lack is enough MBA's to talk about how sound their financial strategy is.

If you normally use a computer at work then no, it is not tax evasion. If you specifically buy a computer to take advantage of a tax break then it's tax evasion. It's like how the paper mill industry figured out if they add diesel fuel to the wood liquor they were already using to power their plants, then it became

I love how you gloss over those "modern industrial standards" like they just appeared out of some rational business decision (hah!) and not decades of bitter fighting on the part of Environmentalists. Modern industrial standards exist because we FORCED businesses to meet them, not because they wanted to.

Victorian smut was tame compared to Medieval porn.

Many times when I consider the sexual deviations that were described by Freud and other psychology pioneers, how obvious it was that all deviancy comes straight from Playboy. I mean NOBODY, EVER EVER EVER was sexually deviant prior to the publication of porn magazines. Nope!

Your depiction of this person is what's sad. There are people who have fetishes for shoes, armpits, long hair, short hair, fat women, thin women, feces, diapers, etc etc. The only thing that's common is that people have things they need to get to orgasm, why is this guy's situation "sad" other than your opinion?

So what's your point then? That we should ignore the crap the studios do because they're not the only reason VFX houses are failing?

That's management's position on every worker under them in every industry. You are a negative number in their spreadsheets and as soon as they can drop you for someone overseas making 1/10th your salary they will gleefully do so.

We don't need a drug to make women into lesbians. We have colleges for that.

You're right, stock is not an indicator of strength. Stock is pretty much an indicator of belief in growth, which is why Amazon can run for years without being profitable. AA however, has no growth potential. They were a somewhat trendy fashion label that has passed it's expiration date and this schlub is starting