Turntabraham_Lincoln
Turntabraham_Lincoln
Turntabraham_Lincoln

This this this.

If I purchased someone (say my son) a gift and he did that, he would quickly learn how quickly the gift would find a new home on ebay, returned to the store, or given to someone who would appreciate it.

This year in november, I took my now 6 year old son through his room, and we packed up toys he doesn't play with as

It's in the gardens of Trocadéro. The statue is called La Femme and it was made by Daniel Bacqué in 1937.

But we eat less process food though. And our meat Have less antibiotic in them and other dangerous thing they fed animals in the state with. I think that's the real problem with the states.

Or Spaceballs related.

and then take all of their stuff GENIUS

I thought this was going to be about Lando Calrissian's cloud city or something.

I first read A Wrinkle in Time in third grade, which explained the differences between the first, second, third, and fourth dimensions. I'd never heard of that before, and it was fascinating.

Most references list at least a dozen likely sources for Fleming's character, guys he knew and worked with before and during WW-II. My money is on Conrad Fulke Thomond O’Brien-ffrench (1893-1986). He was a true MI6 spy and undercover operative, as well as a skiier, mountaineer, linguist and lady's man.

Someone should get all these people in touch so they can swap and get what they wanted. Then shoot them.

When I first read the headline, I thought you meant mine as in coal mine.

The world's most expensive rent collector.


Dammit, DARPA! Eight autonomous robots, each with it's own special ability, is just asking for trouble!

I'm just talking about SCHAFT...

I'd like to see a breakdown of how each robot performed. After the first two, we don't get any information about how they performed any of the tasks. The points scored doesn't tell us much since it doesn't say what the points were scored for. It would be interesting, at least to me, to see what the various strengths

In classical logic (syllogisms) there are much better reasons to not allow an arguer to assume contradictions. For reasons that still baffle me my college logic textbook repeatedly used the principle of explosion (assume a contradiction then make an Or statement that references one of them) to "prove" things. I handed

I think you just explained US politics.