I don't think these are good testing criteria. A standing ovation is a totally arbitrary metric, and simply delivering a talk could be achieved with pre-programmed sequences.

Right? Dude's got this on lock.

I'm ready.

Listen, NASA. You are awesome and you make awesome stuff. But can we sit down and have a quick talk about geometry?

I AM THE BAT

More or less, yeah.

Yes, but not as many millions as it loses:
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nat…

Unfortunately, nearly every university runs their sports program at a loss, and only a small percentage of those budgets are spent on student aid:
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nat…

I think you'd have to paint it manually - the detailing is too precise and varied for a layer style, even if you had several overlaid on each other.

I believe, based on the fry wrapper, you meant "McWonald's".

That's why they're building on an elevated platform, duh.

If you're the Wall Street Journal, "low income" is 180k:

Here's the placeholder 'tails' side of the coin.

Ha! That kind of makes it better, in a way. Mad photo manipulation science, if you will.

Good. No one should drive in New York City.

I dunno. What's sort of cool about early science is that anything could've been true. Without any good evidence, a hydra was just as likely as a giant squid or a platypus. I find the sense of possibility charming and hopeful.

Weird, I've had the exact opposite experience. On the East Coast, servers frequently ask if you want to split the check and always do it if requested, but in the Midwest all I ever got was, "Sorry, we don't do that here." Maybe it's a city-by-city thing?

Nikola Tesla, just chillin' and taking some notes, while SURROUNDED BY LIGHTNING. The quintessential real-life mad scientist photo, if you ask me.