I think this is reverse advertising. I found a new show to watch from this article.......

This is the show you draw the line on? Seriously?

Of all the things that shouldn’t be a show, this is your choice? Storage Wars? Some show on Pawn Shops? Everything on FOXNews? You have better candidates for hate! But, rant on.

I find the show enjoyable.

I saw the Rock lip syncing Taylor, which I liked. I youtubed more of the lip syncing things from Fallon. I finally caught on that they were turning this into its own show. I thought “huh, clear example of too much of a good thing.” But like Johnny Depp in POTC, they’re gonna do it anyway.

If you’re not implying that, then what is your reasoning for why Japanese people should ‘shut the fuck up’ regarding WWII? Imo people should continue to talk about both the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki as well as the rape of Nanking.

As someone who spent a lot of time reading up on the subject, I think it’s generally considered to have been the best of several unfortunately bad options. The Japanese were only willing to surrender conditionally which is simply not going to happen when you happen to have been the aggressors that made the first…

Because one atrocity cancels out the other.

I wish I could just punch Leffen in the face.

It shouldn't be annoying man, it's about the morals of it. Crunchyroll should be doing stuff to defend against this man.

Well, thank goodness some heroic person is finally taking a stand for network security by attacking those darn Crunchyroll bigwigs and showing them the importance of, you know, the internet stuff with the security and whatnot. That'll show 'em.

I'm kinda in this situation right now, where I don't get off as much as I'd like or expect. It's not for his lack of trying (he's great) and it's not that I don't enjoy it (Dear LORD that man makes me lose my damn mind), but that final explosion doesn't happen and I end up exhausted yet wanting more. Perhaps I've…

Sword Art Online is okay. The main draw for me is the action, the characters aren't that interesting (imo).

"It looks bad and won't garner any sympathy" cause when you're so poor that you're on WIC, your first big worry should be what people think of your personal appearance. Not getting a job or paying debts or reorganizing your life, but what randoms on the street will think.

" earned a different income ago."

Your entire comment is based on the premise that anyone should give two fat shits about what a stranger thinks about their appearance. If I take a sudden financial hit, I'm not going to stop wearing nice clothes to avoid being judged by the grocery store checkout person.

Please give us all an itemized list of what a recipients is supposed to look like so that we may distribute it among our clients. They MUST conform to your idea, mustn't they? We need to know what that is. On what continuum, between wearing rags while self flagellating in the lobby of my office to driving a Bentley…

I'd love to know what kind of "reliable" beater worth 5k people are driving around in. Totally stupid to sell a paid off car just to get one that telegraphs "poor" better.

But if you are low income, your are not supposed to be financially savvy. duh.

I read this story off of a reddit link, and a lot of people also came to her defense in keeping the car. The fact is, a known vehicle with a known maintenance history is a relatively smart decision over selling and getting a possible clunker. Controlling risk is just as important as controlling finances.