@jd: While I don't agree with the reasoning of Tossed Pissed, I agree with him overall.

@Charl0: Same thing goes with any alcohol-serving establishment. They reserve the right to refuse service to anybody, for any reason.

@adamthiede: I'm not entirely sure how the quantity of companies in an industry makes any difference to a proud father who built/works for a specific company. Either way, it depends on the father and how proud he is of his job. All I know is if my dad worked for Microsoft, I'd buy Microsoft products when possible. …

@Buckus: Not "wrong". It depends on the father, and Bill Gates is one of those fathers. He's proud of the company he built/works for.

@D-Bomb: I'm not convinced it's bias, per se. It's respect and support, largely. If your dad worked for Ford, there's no way he'd let you come home in a Chevy. That's just disrespectful.

@Pessimippopotamus: Very true! I was trying to think of an appropriate analogy, but yours is much better.

@EnochLight: Maybe I live a little too far north to really get it then.

Putting an image of the iPod as the title picture of an article about the death of the Walkman, simply because of an inadvertent proximity to the date of the iPod's release?

@ps61318: At this point they probably have no drivers - it's a physical design for headphones, not an aural one since Teague isn't an audio engineering firm.

@JamesURLJones: Well, in that case it is a sort of virtual 3D. The CG models themselves have three dimensions to them in a virtual space. The 3D term is much more accurate (but not entirely so) for computer models than stereoscopic films.

With the money he spent on hard drives, you'd think he could afford a nice enclosure. Or at least better materials to make one with.

@Gïmmï Mørgäikköŋëŋ: Hot damn, that is one lucky biker!

@P3nnst8r: Professional Commenter: I agree. Dude was going quite a bit faster than the truck, and he was the one who hit the truck in the side.

@Justin Evidon: They used a different setup, involving a beam-splitting lens with the two cameras side-by-side, if I recall. The rig posted is likely used for 3D work, as going to the source link will show you.

The MacBook Air also does not *need* a case - what I loved about the laptop form factor is that the product protects itself when not in use. Folding screens work damn well.

@superdemon: 3D implies something actually has a physicality and depth to it. "3D" as it is commonly used today is merely illusion of depth, forced in a format our eyes do not naturally work in (layered images with color separation, or flickering images canceled out with shutter glasses).

@supmacka: Just because a lens is old does not mean it performs poorly. I have a 24-70 and the 50mm 1.4. Sure, the 50 is lighter and faster, but 90% of the time I'm not stopping down below f/4 and the zoom adds oodles of function. On top of that, the 24-70 performs equally as well as my 50. Sure, once you go down…

@improprietary: Really! 3D images are not three-dimensional. They're still two dimensional stereoscopic representations of three dimensional objects.

@Chill: As long as they're not continuous/hot lights, you shouldn't be in a bad situation. Photo strobes do get hot, but probably not hot enough to do damage unless they're quite close to the plastic

@Brookespeed: Language is much more fun with heaping amounts of wordglue.