Wow sir, I apologize that you had to go through the soul-killing experience of writing that but that makes a little more sense to me. Even if it’s still 100% bullshit.

But I guess what I don’t understand is if they are generating revenue as an “accidental byproduct” why aren’t they a business then? What kind of revenue…

Likely reduced transparency and possibly (but not likely) public opinion.

OK, I understand revenue sharing. I also understand that many companies issue huge bonuses at year-end to reduce taxable income (usually to nothing). To me these are the same - the person receiving the bonus pays the tax and the NFL teams individually pay their taxes.

That being said, how in the ever living fuck did…

“Cersei struggles. Jon travels.”

Give these guys the promotional materials award.

No I’ve just been outside. But once there, I did drag my ass on the grass like a dog, and BOOM, stats came flying out.

Name a “vaccine injury.” I’ll wait. You keep speaking in generalities. The overwhelming majority of science, public opinion an experience is against you. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence and you can’t even find benign evidence that’s specific.

Yes because I understand my own experience along with statistics. It really is that simple. Most people are vaccinated and live long healthy lives. By most I mean like 99.9999999%

What is the point of this? That the government will help you if there is negligence during your vaccination? Try reading what you send before you link it because you keep digging a deeper hole for yourself while thinking you are draining 3’s all day from behind half court.

Yes because it’s pretty clear that vaccines eliminated many diseases that severely shortened the average human life span.

I doubt it will be as intense as JP in the books, but this is clearly setting up Theon’s redemption story. It’s entirely possible that he saves her more quickly than in the book, who knows though, you’re right its G0T.

She “boinked” him?

Re: the news - the legitimate news sources are generally posting a headline and a link which I find very useful. Along with some close-up detail from some sports reporters.

Twitter is very useful. For the shitbags as well as the reasonable. Generally if someone tweets and it’s not a news source, it’s probably retarded.…

Has Stephen A. Smith in fact beaten hundreds of women in his lifetime and gotten away with it? Do you know anything about this? Please share your stories, I’m just asking the question.

Why are they dangerous then? What are you trying to claim?

An educated person understands what information to discount, yes.

You seem to think that the scientific method of peer review doesn’t work when in fact, the article you just linked to is a great example of how it DOES work. Those papers also were mostly plagarized (aka duplicating discovery, not falsifying it).

Wait, isn’t it the opposite according to the “Book of First Take?”

No, my position is that a blog with accurate information usually references a primary source. You can then refer to that actual source (if it exists) because it is the one with journalistic standards, not the blog.

Yeah, I know nothing about the medical/scientific community that consistently rapes me but protects me from serious preventable diseases.

What exactly is the benefit of avoiding vaccines when they have been proven to not cause autism? Educate me.

“I really don’t care where my information comes from, I look at the content and make an educated decision.”

So you’re basically a Bible “scholar.” Meaning you will study the shit out of any words put in front of you? It matters where information comes from.

“educated decision” - that phrase does not mean what you think…