Enjoy being absolutely unhinged, I guess. At least, that’s how it seems to some. But, you know.

...What new model of Russian troll farmer are you? This is fascinating.

this is a nuts take. you’re inserting your own manufactured outrage where it has no business. You’re literally equating being DTF with harassment or worse. That’s absolute nonsense.

best part of this is the reason they included pascal is because the devs promised the community they’d never include male characters in the game, so 9S was out of the question and they needed a low tier unit.... so they went with pascal.

The real question is... ... ...

For most RPGs, I feel like NPCs deserve better than whatever self-insert PC I’m playing.

Hell, even as a gay man, my guy friends are notably off limits. It’s not rocket science; unless you out yourself to me and make very clear advances, it’s platonic. That’s the default and it’s absolutely okay XD

Known the same friend for 20+ years now, we never felt compelled to bone one another, what’s so hard to understand about this?

Cool, this all sounds absolutely awful. I am too old and have too much going on to play any game that takes “100+” hours to “get going”. All that tells me is that you have an absolutely unfathomable amount of uninteresting content bloat.

They were saying the same stuff right before Fallout 4's release, talking about how there are “400+ hours of gameplay” and the like.

Absolutely. This article is very disconcerting. Doing side quests is knew thing. Pacing sucking to the tune of 50 hours is another.

Yes, he's trying to make it sound like it has impressive longevity when really what he's saying is that a huge chunk of their game is going to be a waste of time

If a game doesn’t really get going until around 50 hours once the main quest is done, then shouldn’t the main quest be better?

same, i like black desert online but ugh...that game has such a convoluted ui imo. gameplay is solid but parsing through all that nonsense is difficult to do

The internet’s been mainly shitting on the writers, to the point where producers have been stepping in to take the blame (insofar as “we had to dumb it down for the Americans” counts as taking responsibility).

I’m sure Hemsworth will be fine, good even, but the problem won’t be him or the actors. It’ll be the producers and the script writers. The producers not caring or think they know better, and the writers probably underpaid and don’t have the time to write anything good.

“IT'S JUST A LITTLE AIRBORNE, IT'S STILL GOOD IT'S STILL GOOD"

I don’t understand why i’m supposed to get worked up about “review bombing” for corporations that spend millions on reputation management to buy reviews

“This means more maps, heroes [locked behind a paywall], game modes, missions [locked behind a paywall], stories [locked behind a paywall], events, cool cosmetics [locked behind a paywall], and features.”

I feel placing all the negative feedback on the shoulders of the pve mode really doesn’t capture why people are so disappointed with Overwatch 2. It’s certainly part of it, but the lack of the promised pve features exists only in the context of Overwatch 1's content being removed from the game for those features and…