If it's canon, I withdraw my objection.

No, it would be a Time Lady. It's not a title, it's a species. Males are Time Lords, females (like Romana) are Time Ladies, and babies are Time Tots. (Not kidding. That's canon.)

NO.

The best part of all the comments explaining what DO NOS means is that it's actually explained at the source link you're cribbing from.

I have to say, I'm amazed: there's almost no concern trolls out of the greys on this article! Go Jezebel!

I agree. It's an attempt to be progressive that ends up horribly back-firing, being a total slap in the face to trans men. The original image on the right just reads as a cutesy, irrelevant list of stuff people say about manhood. It's annoying because of its old-fashioned hetero-normativity, but it's also easily…

Somehow, the revision on the left angers me more than the original on the right...

Uh, or if you identify as a man.

Eh, I think Dracula's answer had a little more poetic edge to it. He even flung a wine glass!

How is this person not grayed out, while I am hanging out in no man's land??

I like the hashtag #truth slapped on to the end of this, like it automatically means you aren't totally full of shit. Like you can just slap #truth on to any crazy bullshit and it automatically makes it true.

"It does not reflect my true views, values, or standards."

Dear Geoffrey Miller: Don't presume to lecture anyone on "willpower" while issuing mea culpas featuring the word "impulsive."

If we're going to deny tax exempt status to the Boy Scouts of America for being discriminatory towards homosexuals, can we also stop granting tax exempt status to churches?

What a great metaphor for postindustrial capitalism

In a world where you need experience to get your foot in the door...

I'm pretty sure lying isn't Lawful Good.

Okay, fellow lady-scientists — who wants to petition for a bill requiring all legislators to pass a comprehension test before they use the words "science," "proof," and "natural" in public? This might also have the side benefit of helping with the whole stupid argument about what the NSF funds.

He's right. It's just so difficult to consider women human beings without jumping through mental gymnastics. I pretend that other women are adorable fluffy bunnies so I can care about their existence above what they can do for me.

So you're saying conservatives don't understand science?