Paul Ryan IS a great stride in human-fish relationships. How else could he be such a bottomfeeder?

Oh. Yeah, I'm with you there.

Which one was bothering you, "AHHH" or "sexxxy"?

This. This, so hard.

Concurred completely, but I'm just marveling at the cognitive dissonance.

He has the same problem with homosexuality. How DARE anyone sleep with someone they find sexually attractive?

Since when do Biblethumpers read the Bible?

I never get why these people think "It is not a sin to be homosexual, but it is a sin to ever act on it, ever" is better than "It is a sin to be homosexual." You are still judging people for having different sexual attractions than you, but now you're saying that it's because they DO things you find icky, not because…

-_- Goalpost shifting!

No, what I'm saying is that the ACA has been interpreted in such a way as to guarantee subsidized Viagra.

Seriously, why are stories like this always written with a "Hoho, we all should have such problems" kind of tone?

Have you not been following the commentary on Obamacare? Numerous opinion pieces have criticized it for subsidizing Viagra even in the case of those convicted of sex crimes. The Washington Post ran an article on it a couple of years ago.

I really have not got the faintest idea. It's just been floating around the internet forever.

More for the rest of us, then. Give me more of that righteous throatfucking, gay agenda!

Yeah, Paul hated everyone, and created the flimsiest of Biblical reasons for it. =/ His work is only part of the canon because the church was consolidating its power in the middle ages, right?

God, I didn't even think of how awful those would be in the water.

How can anyone be remotely comfortable in any of those? I don't mean in an "Oh, I'm Exposed" kind of way, I mean in a literal "How can that actually not be physically uncomfortable to wear" kind of way.

Men can get free VIAGRA, dude.

... Well, that's just super.

Dammit, Sixties, how do you keep having all the best fashion?!