I really do not think it would be. It's a state law that violates the federal constitution. They didn't do it because of the political climate, not because there's no justiciable issue there.

Yeah, I was hoping they'd 14th Amendment that bitch and make it national, but I guess that'll have to come another day.

You ride that slippery slope! Who cares about logical fallacy, amirite?

That's okay, some tribes do set up base camps around foothills.

Sherpas. For pennies a day, you can pay a sherpa to lift and carry your bosom, as well as periodically fanning underneath.

That's an OPTION?

Forgive me, tensions are running a little high on this end. =/ While I recognize your point, I'm not sure that I agree that groups diminish the experience of the individual, because often, groups are defined by shared characteristics. I see it less as exclusive and more as recognizing the harm that falls upon those…

What point? You haven't made a point. All you made was an assumption that I was acting hypocritical based on your own inability to read timestamps. What point were you making?

Is anyone else noticing a lot of "Jezebel Commenters Are Terrible" posts around here lately? I mean, it's a straight-up ad hominem, as anyone can see, but people just keep throwing it up there. What's with that?

Your Internet is in the mail.

Trying to prevent young people from learning about sex and engaging in it with each other is like trying to stop the tide from coming in by punching the ocean.

Yeah, Radfems also say that Trans people are monsters trying to steal femininity and that lesbianism should be a political choice. All I said was "It is reckless to phrase this as a 'Men have it worse' issue just because of the numbers." Can you please stop insulting me?

While I do agree that the source does a better job of it, I do want to clarify that my only point is that this article wrote about it a little recklessly.

"I am incapable of making any effort to understand why other people might have differing opinions, because it is easier to decide that they are irrational monsters. Any assumptions I make in support of that don't need to be supported by facts."

Actually, this only had one reply when it got moved to the top of the page. The reason it got moved up is that the author of the original article responded to it; this is also the reason that other posts with more replies are still not above this one.

Yeah, I was the first person to recommend non's comment when it was posted here, so you can fuck ALL the way off.

No, that is not my argument. Also, I said that men should be getting more attention in the first post. My ONLY argument is that the way it was phrased here was problematic. And congrats, because you're the last person I'm saying this to. I've wasted enough of my life trying to answer people who want me to be making a…

One: I'm saying women are JUST NOW getting representation on this issue, because until recently nobody wanted to admit this even EXISTED and have been saying that women who complain about it shouldn't even be in the army.

Er. That was like half an hour before I started asking to have the other one taken down. It was right after RO's first post.

You're accusing me of a false dichotomy that I am not suggesting is real, and I've spent ENOUGH time in this thread trying to defend myself on things I haven't argued. You all are welcome to respond to points I have actually made, but I'm finished replying to those of you who would prefer I be a man-hating rape…