*IF* the judging of the competition was done blind (that is, the judges did not see the competitors or the competitor’s name in relation to the project being judged, and did not know the gender of the competitors) - then I think this is fine. On an even playing field, women can win on the merits - NO PROBLEM. They…
Theepan
Theepan
Oh my god, that call and response.
Leave Brittany alone!!!!
Or, he’s just an spoiled, entitled asshole.
He’s a gigantic baby who has always fancied himself to be far more important and talented than he actually is.
Depending on your dance moves, dancing naked in the street might earn you that $1500.
Me to! And Can you even imagine the education $1500 would have bought you in 1987. I bet he got an associates degree out of that. Today you couldn’t even pay for one semester at a low rent community college with that.
Holy shit, $1500. That’s nothing. Absolutely nothing. If I only had $1500 in student loan debt right now, I’d be dancing naked in the street.
No, but lying to Crown prosecutors, or hiding the ‘whole truth’ from them makes you an unreliable witness at your rapist’s trial. OJ murdered his ex-wife, but the state employed a liar to gather evidence against him, so, sadly, he was acquitted.
That doesn’t make the statement less true.
What makes you say that?
Reading the prosecutions closing statements, it was not about their behaviour during or after the assault, it is the fact that they lied to police, the crown and covered it up until they were on the witness stand. If the defense wasn’t allowed to get their own evidence, the truth would not have come out. The fact that…
Better question: Why not?
But you do have the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, including sections 11(c) and 13.
Section 11(c) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. “Any person charged with an offence had the right not to be compelled to be a witness in proceedings against that person in respect of the offence.
Yes there is. The privilege against self-incrimination is in the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Sections 11(c) and 13.
I know right!!! Like fuck the 5th Amendment - they should have to answer for their crimes!!!
Why?
The three complainants lied to the Crown and have done a disservice to sexual assault victims.